Sorry. This is incorrect.
I can not speak too much about series convergence/divergence, but I can talk about a sequence:
What happens to [tex]\frac{2n+1}{3n-1}[/tex] as n ---> infinity?
You can rig this so that the 1's cancel and you are then left with [tex]\frac{2n}{3n}[/tex] which obviously then cancels down to [tex]\frac{2}{3}[/tex] (i.e. the limit of the sequence).
Now as you are actually dealing with a natural log, the limit of the sequence in actual fact is [tex]ln(\frac{2}{3})[/tex]
If you wished to prove this you could do the following for all n > N: [tex]|ln (\frac{2n+1}{3n-1}) - ln(\frac{2}{3})|<\epsilon[/tex] Also, note that this sum is not a geometric progression: you find r as such: [tex]r = \frac{t_{n}}{t_{n-1}}[/tex] where [tex]t_{n}[/tex] is the nth term of the series. Take note of the second term of the sequence, it equals zero, and division by zero is undefined. Also, r is the common ratio. So the series is, by definition, not geometric in nature.
I am not absolutely sure of this, but I believe the series in fact diverges to negative infinity, because of the simplification of the natural log as per above. You have an infinite number of ln(2/3) to multiply out which is equal (in a very loose sense) to negative infinity. I may be wrong however.