Series Estimation: Estimating Terms Needed to Reach |Error|<0.001

  • Thread starter Thread starter fsm
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Series
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves estimating the number of terms needed in the alternating series \(\sum\frac{(-1)^{x}}{x*\sqrt{x}}\) to achieve an error less than 0.001. The context is within the study of series convergence and error estimation.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Conceptual clarification

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the conditions for applying error estimation methods, particularly focusing on the continuity and monotonicity of the function involved. There is mention of comparing the series to a p-series and considerations about the behavior of the terms.

Discussion Status

Some participants have offered guidance on using properties of alternating series to estimate the error, while others express uncertainty about the function's characteristics. The discussion reflects a mix of interpretations and approaches without a clear consensus on the next steps.

Contextual Notes

There is a noted concern regarding the function's positivity and decreasing nature, which are critical for applying certain convergence tests. The original poster also expresses frustration with the problem setup.

fsm
Messages
88
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


\sum\frac{(-1)^{x}}{x*\sqrt{x}}

How many terms must be added to get an esimate with an |error|<0.001?

Homework Equations


s_n+ \int f(x)dx \leq s \leq s_n+ \int f(x)dx

The Attempt at a Solution


I having some problems trying to attempt this. To use this the function must be continuous which it is. Then it has to be positive and decreasing--this to me is the rub. The graph is symmertic at the horizontal asymptote x=0. So part of the graph is negative and increasing. I feel like I hit a brick wall. The only other thing I can think of is to rewrite the demoninator as x^(3/2), compare to a p-series and then find how many terms.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
anyone?
 
There's a generic method for alternating series you can use to easily answer this question.
 
Since, as NateTG said, this is an alternating sequence, the error, after n terms can't be more than the difference between the last two terms. Plot a few terms on a number line to convince your self of this.
 
Thanks everyone for the help. I thought that originally but second guessed myself. And I got the answer.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
8K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K