Series question (non-baby rudin, ch. 4, #7)

  • Thread starter Thread starter xeno_gear
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Series
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on proving that if the series \(\sum_n a_n b_n < \infty\) for non-negative \(b_n\) and \(\sum_n b_n^2 < \infty\), then it follows that \(\sum_n a_n^2 < \infty\). The participants utilize the hint provided in the problem, which involves defining disjoint sets \(E_k\) where \(\sum_{n \in E_k} a_n^2 > 1\) and manipulating the sequences \(b_n\) to demonstrate the relationship between the sums. The application of the Cauchy-Schwarz (CBS) inequality is suggested as a potential method for further exploration.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of series convergence and divergence
  • Familiarity with Cauchy-Schwarz inequality
  • Knowledge of sequences and their properties
  • Basic proficiency in mathematical notation and manipulation
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the Cauchy-Schwarz inequality in detail and its applications in series
  • Explore the properties of convergent series and their implications
  • Investigate the concept of disjoint sets in the context of series
  • Review advanced topics in real analysis related to sequences and series
USEFUL FOR

Mathematics students, particularly those studying real analysis, as well as educators and tutors looking to deepen their understanding of series convergence and inequalities.

xeno_gear
Messages
40
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Suppose [tex]\{a_n\}[/tex] is a sequence of positive numbers such that [tex]\sum_na_nb_n < \infty[/tex] whenever [tex]b_n \ge 0[/tex] and [tex]\sum_nb_n^2 < \infty[/tex]. Prove that [tex]\sum_na_n^2 < \infty[/tex].

Homework Equations



There's a suggestion in the text:
If [tex]\sum_na_n^2 = \infty[/tex], then there are disjoint sets [tex]E_k \, (k=1,2,3,\dots)[/tex] so that
[tex]\[\sum_{n\in E_k}a_n^2 > 1.\][/tex]
Define [tex]b_n[/tex] so that [tex]b_n = c_ka_n[/tex] for [tex]n \in E_k[/tex]. For suitably chosen [tex]c_k[/tex], [tex]\sum_na_nb_n = \infty[/tex] although [tex]\sum_nb_n^2 < \infty.[/tex]



The Attempt at a Solution


Using the hint, we've got
[tex] \[b_n^2 = c_k^2a_n^2; \qquad\qquad a_nb_n = c_ka_n^2\]<br /> \begin{align*}<br /> S1 = \sum_n b_n^2 &= \sum_{n\in E_1} c_1^2 a_n^2 + \sum_{n\in E_2} c_2^2 a_n^2 + \dots \\<br /> &= \sum_k \sum_{n_k\in E_k} c_k^2 a_{n_k}^2 < \infty\\<br /> S2 = \sum_n a_n b_n &= \sum_k \sum_{n_k\in E_k} c_k a_{n_k}^2 = \infty.<br /> \end{align*}[/tex]

From this, it seems clear that we want to choose the [tex]c_k[/tex] to be "sufficiently dampening" so that [tex]S1[/tex] really is finite but [tex]S2[/tex] is not. I'm not entirely sure how to go about choosing the [tex]c_k[/tex] for arbitrary [tex]a_n[/tex] and [tex]b_n[/tex]. Thanks very much, any hints would be greatly appreciated! Sorry about the formatting, I'm new here..
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Perhaps a well-known inequality dealing with sums would help.
 
Thanks for the hint! I'm assuming you're referring to the CBS inequality, but I'm not quite sure how to apply it in a useful way.

I've got
[tex] \sum_n a_nb_n \le \sqrt{\sum_n a_n^2}\sqrt{\sum_n b_n^2}[/tex]
and the RHS is infinite since the sum of the squares of the a_n is infinite.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
3K