Set of all finite subsets of N (real analysis)

Click For Summary
The discussion centers on proving that the set of all finite subsets of natural numbers (N) is countable. The initial approach involved defining a set of finite subsets and recognizing that while each subset is countable, the overall set's countability is not immediately clear. The conversation shifts to using induction to establish a bijection between finite subsets and N, with the basis case being straightforward. The inductive step involves showing that if a set of subsets of size n is countable, then the set of subsets of size n+1 remains countable. The conclusion emphasizes that the union of countable sets leads to the overall countability of the set of all finite subsets of N.
KevinL
Messages
37
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Show that the set of all finite subsets of N is a countable set.

The Attempt at a Solution



At first I thought this was really easy. I had A = {B1, B2, B3, ... }, where Bn is some finite subset of N. Since any B is finite and therefore countable, and since a union of finite sets is countable, then the set of all finite subsets is countable. But I'm pretty sure this is false because its sort of assuming that the set A is countable.

So I got to thinking that I could consider a1 to be the set of all finite one-element subsets of N. And then perhaps expand that idea to an+1 to be any of these such sets. From here though, I'm not sure how to prove that the set of all of these subsets is countable.

Im thinking induction, and the basis step is a pretty obvious bijection with N. But I don't know where to go from here.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Try thinking about how you should go about showing your bijection onto N. How would you make sure you didnt miss any elements?
 
Are you familiar with the Cantor-Schroeder-Bernstein theorem? If so this isn’t so bad. Let’s call N'
your set of all finite subsets of N.

N->N'should be trivial

Hint for N’->N. Consider the set Nb' the set of N' in binary format. So {1,3,5} -> {1,11, 101}. Clearly Nb' and N' are bijective.

Is there an easy way to uniquely map every element of Nb' into N by using digits other than “0” and “1”
 
Im trying it with induction.

Let A be the set of all finite subsets of N

Let an , n>=1 be a set of subsets of N each with cardinality of n.

Claim: Any an is countable, so the union from n=0 to infinity of an is countable, and thus A would be countable. Prove by induction.

basis: n=1, a1: N: 1 2 3...
a1: {1}{2}{3}... and we have an obvious bijection.

Inductive hypothesis: Assume an is countable. Show an+1 is countable.

For any set S is an element of an+1, remove an arbitrary element K. The resulting sets are T and P such that T is an element of an, and K is an element of P is an element of a1.

By inductive hypothesis, T is countable. By basis step we know a1 is countable. So the union of T and P is countable, so an+1 is countable. Therefore A is countable.

Does this look right?
 
this step doesn't follow:
So the union of T and P is countable, so an+1 is countable. Therefore A is countable.

The union of T and P is your S, not your an+1
 
Question: A clock's minute hand has length 4 and its hour hand has length 3. What is the distance between the tips at the moment when it is increasing most rapidly?(Putnam Exam Question) Answer: Making assumption that both the hands moves at constant angular velocities, the answer is ## \sqrt{7} .## But don't you think this assumption is somewhat doubtful and wrong?

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
34
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K