Set problem of x-intercepts and y-intercepts

  • Thread starter Thread starter Lilt
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Set
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves determining the number of lines represented by the equation y = mx + b, constrained by the condition m + b = 36, for which both the x- and y-intercepts are integers.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the relationship between the coefficients m and b, and how they affect the intercepts of the line. There is exploration of the algebraic manipulation of the line equation and its implications for the intercepts being integers.

Discussion Status

Several participants are analyzing the algebraic steps involved in transforming the line equation and questioning the assumptions about the integer nature of the intercepts. Some guidance has been offered regarding the intercepts and the conditions on m for them to be integers, but no consensus has been reached on a specific method or solution.

Contextual Notes

Participants note potential confusion regarding the algebraic steps and the implications of the condition m + b = 36. There is also mention of the appropriateness of the thread's placement within the forum.

Lilt
Messages
4
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Let S be the set of all lines with equation y = mx+b for which m+b = 36. For how many of the elements of S are both the x- and y-intercepts integers?

Homework Equations



y = mx+b for which m+b = 36

The Attempt at a Solution



I'm just not wrapping my mind around the steps in the solution here:

Denote by (a,0); (0, b) correspondingly x-intercept and y-intercept
of a line. Adding the equalities given in the problem and simplifying the result,
we will come to the equation of the set of the lines y = (m-1)x+36​

From that point onward, I can see and work through the steps. If I were to add these two equations, then I get y = mx + m + 2b - 36. I figure there's substitution occurring for their simplification, but I'm oblivious to it.

edit: Oh jeez, and I posted this in the wrong subsection. Should I re-post it, or will this be moved? Sorry about that!
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
I found success by finding the x intercept of y=mx+b, and then analyzing what is necessary to make that intercept an integer.
 
Lilt said:
1.

I'm just not wrapping my mind around the steps in the solution here:

Denote by (a,0); (0, b) correspondingly x-intercept and y-intercept
of a line. Adding the equalities given in the problem and simplifying the result,
we will come to the equation of the set of the lines y = (m-1)x+36​


It means the set of lines are all the lines that intercept y-axis at 36 and have gradient of (m-1).
But you data show y=(36-b)x+b
Lines intercept at y=b and have gradient of (36-b). So we have infinite numbers of solution.
 
Last edited:
Lilt said:

Homework Statement



Let S be the set of all lines with equation y = mx+b for which m+b = 36. For how many of the elements of S are both the x- and y-intercepts integers?

Homework Equations



y = mx+b for which m+b = 36

The Attempt at a Solution



I'm just not wrapping my mind around the steps in the solution here:
Denote by (a,0); (0, b) correspondingly x-intercept and y-intercept
of a line. Adding the equalities given in the problem and simplifying the result,
we will come to the equation of the set of the lines y = (m-1)x+36​
From that point onward, I can see and work through the steps. If I were to add these two equations, then I get y = mx + m + 2b - 36. I figure there's substitution occurring for their simplification, but I'm oblivious to it.

edit: Oh jeez, and I posted this in the wrong subsection. Should I re-post it, or will this be moved? Sorry about that!
Hello Lilt. Welcome to PF !

(I have requested that this thread be moved to precalculus.)

If m+b = 36, then b = 36 - m.

Plug-in 36 - m in place of b in y = mx + b.

If you solve for m, you will find a point through which all these lines pass; (lines with equation y = mx+b having m + b = 36).

More pertinent to the question at hand:
The intercept-intercept form of a line is \displaystyle \frac{x}{a}+\frac{y}{b}=1\,, where a is the x-intercept and b is the y-intercept. If you put the equation for your line into this form it may be easier to get the answer.​
 
I'm still stumbling on the algebra, I think.

So if they solved for b and got b = 36 - m

And plugged that into get y = mx + (36 - m)

They would re-order the equation y = mx - m +36

And then factored out m, y = m(x-1) + 36

But they have y = (m-1)x + 36

Maybe they made an error? And thank you for the welcome :)
 
Last edited:
Lilt said:
I'm still stumbling on the algebra, I think.

So if they solved for b and got b = 36 - m

And plugged that into get y = mx + (36 - m)

They would re-order the equation y = mx - m +36

And then factored out m, y = m(x-1) + 36

But they have y = (m-1)x + 36

Maybe they made an error? And thank you for the welcome :)
B is the y-intercept. Right?

What can you say about m, if the y-intercept has to be an integer?

How do you find the x-intercept from the equation, y = m(x-1) + 36 ?
 
I don't see any reason to look at y= m(x- 1)+ 36. Since the question asks about the line y= mx+ b= mx+ 36- m, look at its intercepts- when x= 0, y= 36- m which must be an integer. When y= 0, x= (m- 36)/m= 1- 36/m which must be an integer. So m must be an integer that evenly divides 36.
 
HallsofIvy said:
I don't see any reason to look at y= m(x- 1)+ 36. Since the question asks about the line y= mx+ b= mx+ 36- m, look at its intercepts- when x= 0, y= 36- m which must be an integer. When y= 0, x= (m- 36)/m= 1- 36/m which must be an integer. So m must be an integer that evenly divides 36.
Well, if y = 0, then it seems to me that the equation, y = m(x- 1)+ 36 → 0 = m(x- 1)+ 36 lends itself to solving for x, which gives the x intercept. So, if you're looking for a reason, that's one reason.

Another reason to write the equation of the line as y= m(x- 1)+ 36 is: this form of the line gives a family of lines passing through the point, (1, 36), with their slopes parametrized by m.

It's not necessary to use this form for the equation of the line. It's just that in my view it might be helpful.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K