Set theory. What does this mean?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion explains the notation \(\mathbb{Z}/2\mathbb{Z}\), which represents the set of integers modulo 2, effectively categorizing integers into equivalence classes of even and odd numbers. It clarifies that \(\mathbb{Z}\) is the set of all integers, while \(2\mathbb{Z}\) includes all even integers. The equivalence relation defined allows for the grouping of integers into two classes: even integers and odd integers. This quotient structure can be generalized to \(\mathbb{Z}/(n\mathbb{Z})\), which results in equivalence classes based on the modulus \(n\). The discussion concludes by noting that \(\mathbb{Z}/2\mathbb{Z}\) forms a field with two elements, confirming the clarity of the explanation.
omoplata
Messages
327
Reaction score
2
If \mathbb{Z} is the set of integers, what does \mathbb{Z/2Z} mean?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It is the integers modulo 2.

\mathbb{Z} is the set of integers, and 2\mathbb{Z} is the set of even integers, and \mathbb{Z}/\mathbb{2Z} is the set of integers modulo the ideal of even integers.

The notation A/B crops up all over the place in many different contexts, so here's a general explanation of roughly what it means:

A is some structure (in this case a ring, but it could be a group, a Lie algebra, a topological space...) and B is some special substructure of A (or in some contexts sometimes an equivalence relation on A). A/B is what you get when you regard the members of B as being equivalent. The exact definition depends somewhat on context. So in this case, we regard all the even integers as equivalent and by extension all the odd integers as equivalent, leaving just two elements in \mathbb{Z}/(2\mathbb{Z}): the set of odd integers and the set of even integers (the equivalence classes).

More generally, we could take the set \mathbb{Z}/(n\mathbb{Z})=\{[0],[1],\ldots,[n-1]\}, where the square brackets mean 'equivalence class of', so [k] = \{\ldots, k-2n, k-n,k,k+n,k+2n,\ldots\} as the integers modulo n.

Hope that's useful; it's hard to know what level to pitch it at. If you want more details or less jargon I'll be happy to rephrase.
 
Hi omoplata! :smile:

That is actually a notation from abstract algebra. You probably know that 2\mathbb{Z} is all the multiples of 2 (thus all even numbers).

Now, on \mathbb{Z}, we can put the following equivalence relation:

x\sim y~\Leftrightarrow~x-y\in 2\mathbb{Z}

Then \mathbb{Z}/2\mathbb{Z} is simply the quotient of this equivalence relation (thus the set of all equivalence classes).

It is easy to see that

\mathbb{Z}/2\mathbb{Z}=\{2\mathbb{Z},2\mathbb{Z}+1\}

thus the set contains two elements. We can easily put an addition and multiplication on this set and this gives us a field with two elements.

I hope that is clear!
 
I get it now. Thanks a lot.
 
Note that although henry_m and Micromass are using different words, they are saying the same thing!
 
HallsofIvy said:
Note that although henry_m and Micromass are using different words, they are saying the same thing!

Well, yeah. I understood that.
 
I was reading documentation about the soundness and completeness of logic formal systems. Consider the following $$\vdash_S \phi$$ where ##S## is the proof-system making part the formal system and ##\phi## is a wff (well formed formula) of the formal language. Note the blank on left of the turnstile symbol ##\vdash_S##, as far as I can tell it actually represents the empty set. So what does it mean ? I guess it actually means ##\phi## is a theorem of the formal system, i.e. there is a...

Similar threads

Replies
10
Views
3K
Replies
18
Views
2K
Replies
14
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Back
Top