Setting up vector equations for problem solving

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Mr Davis 97
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Problem solving Vector
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around the proper setup of vector equations in the context of a physics problem involving a sailor climbing a rope ladder. Participants explore the implications of sign conventions in vector equations, particularly in relation to Newton's second law and the calculation of work done.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant expresses confusion about the correct setup of vector equations, particularly regarding the signs of the forces involved when applying Newton's second law.
  • Another participant points out that both equations presented by the first poster cannot be correct simultaneously, questioning the consistency of the signs used.
  • A third participant agrees that since the sailor is moving at constant velocity, the acceleration is zero, which should influence the equations used.
  • A later reply emphasizes the importance of establishing a positive reference direction for each axis and maintaining consistency in sign usage throughout the calculations.
  • This reply also discusses how the concept of work can vary based on perspective, noting that work done by the sailor while climbing is considered positive, while work done on the sailor by gravity when descending can be viewed as negative, depending on the chosen reference direction.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the correct approach to setting up the vector equations, as there are multiple competing views regarding the use of signs and the implications of constant velocity on the equations.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight the need for consistent sign conventions and reference directions, but there is no resolution on the specific mathematical steps or assumptions that should be applied in this scenario.

Mr Davis 97
Messages
1,461
Reaction score
44
I am confused about exactly how to set up vector equations properly when it comes to the sign of the vectors. Take the following problem for example. A 70.0 kg sailor climbs an 11.5 m long rope ladder to a mast above at constant velocity. The rope ladder is at an angle of 30.0° with the mast. Assume that the ladder is frictionless. What is the work done?

To start, I would use Newton's second law:

##\sum_{1}^{n}\vec{F}_{n} = \vec{F}_{\textrm{app}} + \vec{F}_{\textrm{g}} = \vec{F}_{\textrm{net}} = m\vec{a}##
##F_{\textrm{app||}} + F_{\textrm{g||}} = m\vec{a_{||}}##
##F_{\textrm{app||}} + F_{\textrm{g||}} = 0##
##F_{\textrm{app||}} = - F_{\textrm{g||}} = -(-mg)\sin \theta = mg\sin \theta##

But why would this setup be correct? For example, couldn't I have bypassed all those steps and reasoned that...

##F_{\textrm{app||}} - F_{\textrm{g||}} = 0## (there is a negative because the component is negative)
##F_{\textrm{app||}} = F_{\textrm{g||}}##
##F_{\textrm{app||}} = -mg\sin \theta##

However, this has the opposite sign as the last answer! What am I doing wrong? How should I be approaching these problems when it comes to setting up my vector equations? Could someone give me a concrete example, with all steps, of how they would solve this problem (with special attention to the use of signs)?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
(Ignoring special notation)
2nd line: F_app+F_g=ma
3rd line: F_app+F_g=0

Both can't be right!
 
mathman said:
(Ignoring special notation)
2nd line: F_app+F_g=ma
3rd line: F_app+F_g=0

Both can't be right!

Why not? The sailor is moving at a constant velocity, so a = 0. Right?
 
When dealing with forces and Newtons 2nd Law one says the Fnet = Σ+Fi Then establish a positive reference directions for each axis so when you substitute the expression for each individual force component you will at that point determine the proper sign.to use . Just be consistent.

In the first set of equations you wrote Fapp+Fg = 0 and in the second set Fapp-Fg = 0. that account for the discrepancy . you should not have used the neg sign in the second

Another application where it can make big difference is in calculating work. Work can be done on something or something can be doing work.. In the sailor example the sailor is doing work in climbing the ladder. When the sailor descends gravity is doing work on the sailor. Work done by something is often consider positive and work done on something is considered negative. but that could be reversed. again just be consistent. For our sailor example up is taken as positive and the sailors effort is up thus work is positive.. So in going up the ladder work is being done by the sailor. But In coming down the distance moved is negative but the force is still positive ( the sailor is holding the ladder) so work is negative and is being done on the sailor. But also note that the force of gravity is negative and the distance moved is negative so the work done is positive but that is the work done by gravity on the sailor. Does that make sense?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
6K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
5K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
4K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K