Shaking the Atom: Electron Shells & Nucleus Resonance

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter warabi
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Atom
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the interaction between electromagnetic radiation and atomic structure, specifically examining the movement of the electron shell relative to the nucleus when exposed to linearly polarized light. It establishes that a resonant frequency exists where significant electromagnetic energy absorption occurs, leading to observable collective movement of the electron shell. The analysis employs concepts from classical mechanics, including the effective potential energy of the hydrogen atom and its harmonic oscillator behavior, ultimately linking these findings to atomic transitions as described in the Bohr model.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of atomic structure, specifically the hydrogen atom
  • Familiarity with electromagnetic radiation and its properties
  • Knowledge of classical mechanics, particularly harmonic oscillators
  • Basic grasp of quantum mechanics, including the Bohr model
NEXT STEPS
  • Explore the implications of angular momentum conservation in atomic transitions
  • Investigate the role of electromagnetic radiation in quantum state transitions
  • Learn about the mathematical modeling of effective potential energy in quantum systems
  • Study the principles of resonance in atomic and molecular physics
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, quantum mechanics students, and researchers interested in atomic interactions and the effects of electromagnetic radiation on atomic structures.

warabi
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
The nucleus has positive charge, with negative electron shell(s) around it. The nucleus is located in the center of the electron shell. Electrical forces keep it there.

Now what if we shine electromagnetic radiation (linearly polarised) onto an atom? With the E-field going "up", will the nucleus have a tendency to move "up", with the electron shell wanting to move "down"? Will there be a resonant frequency in which a relatively large amount of electromagnetic energy is absorbed from the incoming radiation, and the relative movement between nucleus and shell is maximised? In other words could there be movement of the electron shell "as a whole", not e.g. excitation of individual electrons, and could it be observable?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
A two-body problem is equivalent to a problem of a particle with reduced mass:

<br /> \frac{1}{m} = \frac{1}{m_{1}} + \frac{1}{m_{2}}<br />

in the center-of-mass frame. For hydrogen atom, this would be the Coulomb potential. Due to conservation of angular momentum \mathbf{L}, the motion may be further reduced to the radial direction (one-dimensional) in an effective potential energy:

<br /> V_{l}(r) = \frac{L^{2}}{2 m r^{2}} - \frac{k_{0} e^{2}}{r}<br />

This "effective" potential energy has a local minimum:

<br /> V_{l}&#039;(r) = -\frac{L^{2}}{m r^{3}} + \frac{k_{0} e^{2}}{r^{2}} = 0<br />

<br /> r_{0} = \frac{L^{2}}{m k_{0} e^{2}}<br />

<br /> V_{l}&#039;&#039;(r) = \frac{3 L^{2}}{m r^{4}} - \frac{2 k_{0} e^{2}}{r^{3}} = \frac{m^{3} (k_{0} e^{2})^{4}}{L^{6}} \equiv k &gt; 0<br />

Around this local minimum, the effective potential energy may be expanded into Taylor series:

<br /> V_{l}(r) = V_{l}(r_{0}) + \frac{1}{2} k (r - r_{0})^{2}<br />

i.e. it looks like a harmonic oscillator. The oscillation frequency is:

<br /> \omega = \sqrt{\frac{k}{m}} = \frac{m (k_{0} e^{2})^{2}}{L^{3}}<br />

If one uses L \sim \hbar, one gets that this oscillation frequency is the same as the transition frequency emitted or absorbed in the Bohr model, up to numerical factors. So, what you had described is actually the classical picture of atomic transitions. The only important feature we had neglected is that the photon carries angular momentum, so the angular momentum of the atom during such transitions is not conserved.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K