Shape of Space-Time: Warping Explained

  • Thread starter Thread starter Fuinne
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Shape Space-time
Fuinne
Messages
22
Reaction score
3
It space time is able to be warped, what is the shape of it? If it doesn't have a physical shape how can it be warped?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
"Warped" is an English language word that does a poor job of describing what's going on and it is mostly due to applying Euclidean Geometry to a construct (space-time) that is NOT Euclidean. In Riemann Geometry, which is what more appropriately describes space-time, things move in straight lines called "geodesics", which if looked at from a framework of Euclidean Geometry, appear curved or "warped".
 
Fuinne said:
It space time is able to be warped, what is the shape of it? If it doesn't have a physical shape how can it be warped?
The shape of spacetime is given by:
##G_{\mu\nu}+\Lambda g_{\mu\nu}=8\pi T_{\mu\nu}##

This is the Einstein field equation. The left hand side describes the shape of spacetime and the right hand side describes the distribution of energy, momentum, and stress.
 
DaleSpam said:
The shape of spacetime is given by:
##G_{\mu\nu}+\Lambda g_{\mu\nu}=8\pi T_{\mu\nu}##

This is the Einstein field equation. The left hand side describes the shape of spacetime and the right hand side describes the distribution of energy, momentum, and stress.
So is it some sort of amorphous shape?
 
It is a shape determined by the distribution of stress energy. Different distributions give different shapes, as described above.

Also, we don't have English words for the shape of most 4D pseudo Riemannian manifolds. So we describe it mathematically by the metric ##g_{\mu\nu}## The metric is the shape of spacetime.
 
Last edited:
OK, so this has bugged me for a while about the equivalence principle and the black hole information paradox. If black holes "evaporate" via Hawking radiation, then they cannot exist forever. So, from my external perspective, watching the person fall in, they slow down, freeze, and redshift to "nothing," but never cross the event horizon. Does the equivalence principle say my perspective is valid? If it does, is it possible that that person really never crossed the event horizon? The...
ASSUMPTIONS 1. Two identical clocks A and B in the same inertial frame are stationary relative to each other a fixed distance L apart. Time passes at the same rate for both. 2. Both clocks are able to send/receive light signals and to write/read the send/receive times into signals. 3. The speed of light is anisotropic. METHOD 1. At time t[A1] and time t[B1], clock A sends a light signal to clock B. The clock B time is unknown to A. 2. Clock B receives the signal from A at time t[B2] and...
From $$0 = \delta(g^{\alpha\mu}g_{\mu\nu}) = g^{\alpha\mu} \delta g_{\mu\nu} + g_{\mu\nu} \delta g^{\alpha\mu}$$ we have $$g^{\alpha\mu} \delta g_{\mu\nu} = -g_{\mu\nu} \delta g^{\alpha\mu} \,\, . $$ Multiply both sides by ##g_{\alpha\beta}## to get $$\delta g_{\beta\nu} = -g_{\alpha\beta} g_{\mu\nu} \delta g^{\alpha\mu} \qquad(*)$$ (This is Dirac's eq. (26.9) in "GTR".) On the other hand, the variation ##\delta g^{\alpha\mu} = \bar{g}^{\alpha\mu} - g^{\alpha\mu}## should be a tensor...
Back
Top