- #1
- 3,509
- 1,072
"Shape preserving" fitting algorithms
Does anyone know if there is such a thing as a "shape preserving" fitting algorithm?
Now and then I run into the following problem: I have a set of rapidly varying data and try to fit it using an equation with e.g. 5 unknowns; I know that I can make it fit "by hand" (basically trial and error). However, when I try to fit it I often get that the solution is e.g. a straight line through the data; simply because it is a "good" solution in the least-square sense(although it doesn't make much sense from physical point of view). The wiki on the MLA even shows one example of this.
I can obviously get it to fit if I start with a "good" guess but that sort of defies the purpose of automatic fitting (and I often need to fit hundreds of experimental curves and sometimes in "real time" so doing it by hand is not really an option).
I understand that the problem is -there are several minima and the fitting algorithms finds the "wrong one" unless the initial conditions are close to the real solution- but I don't know how to solve it.
Presumably this is well-known problem, but I haven't been able to find a reference where they discuss possible solutions.
Is there any way of adding "shape preservation" to e.g. the MLA? E.g. by somehow adding that the condition for a "best fit" is that also the derivatives fit reasonably well?
Or are there any other possible solutions?
Does anyone know if there is such a thing as a "shape preserving" fitting algorithm?
Now and then I run into the following problem: I have a set of rapidly varying data and try to fit it using an equation with e.g. 5 unknowns; I know that I can make it fit "by hand" (basically trial and error). However, when I try to fit it I often get that the solution is e.g. a straight line through the data; simply because it is a "good" solution in the least-square sense(although it doesn't make much sense from physical point of view). The wiki on the MLA even shows one example of this.
I can obviously get it to fit if I start with a "good" guess but that sort of defies the purpose of automatic fitting (and I often need to fit hundreds of experimental curves and sometimes in "real time" so doing it by hand is not really an option).
I understand that the problem is -there are several minima and the fitting algorithms finds the "wrong one" unless the initial conditions are close to the real solution- but I don't know how to solve it.
Presumably this is well-known problem, but I haven't been able to find a reference where they discuss possible solutions.
Is there any way of adding "shape preservation" to e.g. the MLA? E.g. by somehow adding that the condition for a "best fit" is that also the derivatives fit reasonably well?
Or are there any other possible solutions?
