Shell balances in cylindrical coordinates

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the formulation of shell balances in cylindrical coordinates for transport phenomena. Participants debate the appropriate division of the conservation equation by the control volume's volume, specifically questioning the use of 2πΔrL versus 2πRΔrL. It is established that while both methods yield correct results, the choice of division affects the final outcome of the integrated ordinary differential equation (ODE). The conversation emphasizes the importance of understanding the implications of these choices in cylindrical coordinate systems.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of conservation equations in transport phenomena
  • Familiarity with cylindrical coordinate systems
  • Knowledge of ordinary differential equations (ODEs)
  • Basic principles of flux and control volumes
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of conservation equations in cylindrical coordinates
  • Learn about the implications of different volume definitions in shell balances
  • Explore the integration techniques for ordinary differential equations (ODEs)
  • Investigate practical applications of shell balances in engineering problems
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in chemical engineering, mechanical engineering, and applied physics who are involved in transport phenomena and fluid dynamics analysis.

Muhammad Waleed Khan
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
I have a question regarding writing a shell balance for a cylindrical system with transport in one direction (in any area of transport phenomena). When we set up the conservation equation(say steady state), we multiply the flux and the area at the surfaces of our control volume and plug them into the eqn. Afterwards I believe that we divide the resulting equation by the volume of the control volume before taking the limit as DelX,DelZ or DelR approaches 0. In cartesian coordinates we divide this by delXdelYdelZ, but why in cylindrical CV do we divide by 2.pi.DelR.L instead of 2.pi.R.DelR.L (which is the volume of our CV)?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Muhammad Waleed Khan said:
I have a question regarding writing a shell balance for a cylindrical system with transport in one direction (in any area of transport phenomena). When we set up the conservation equation(say steady state), we multiply the flux and the area at the surfaces of our control volume and plug them into the eqn. Afterwards I believe that we divide the resulting equation by the volume of the control volume before taking the limit as DelX,DelZ or DelR approaches 0. In cartesian coordinates we divide this by delXdelYdelZ, but why in cylindrical CV do we divide by 2.pi.DelR.L instead of 2.pi.R.DelR.L (which is the volume of our CV)?
Of course, you could also divide by ##2\pi r \Delta r L##. That won't change the final result. But, the authors must of thought it was more convenient and aesthetically pleasing to do it their way. Both ways are right.
 
Chestermiller said:
Of course, you could also divide by ##2\pi r \Delta r L##. That won't change the final result. But, the authors must of thought it was more convenient and aesthetically pleasing to do it their way. Both ways are right.
Yeah but it changes the final answer you get from integrating the resulting ODE.
 
Muhammad Waleed Khan said:
Yeah but it changes the final answer you get from integrating the resulting ODE.
Please show me how you think the answer will be different. Start out by showing me the two versions of the ODE that you get.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
5K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
5K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
10K