SHM w/ Friction: Will Oscillating Object Stop at Equilibrium?

  • Thread starter Thread starter SciencePF
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Friction Shm
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the behavior of a mass oscillating on a spring in the presence of friction. Participants explore whether the oscillating object can come to rest at the equilibrium position (x=0) or if it will stop at a different position due to the effects of friction.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Conceptual clarification

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the relationship between friction and the restoring force of the spring, questioning whether the object can stop at the equilibrium position. Some suggest that static friction may prevent the object from reaching x=0, while others consider the implications of different starting positions and the nature of the damping forces involved.

Discussion Status

The conversation is ongoing, with various interpretations being explored. Some participants offer insights into the mechanics of oscillation and friction, while others seek clarification on specific points. There is no explicit consensus on whether the object can stop at the equilibrium position.

Contextual Notes

Participants are considering the effects of different types of damping (overdamped, underdamped, critically damped) and how these relate to the initial conditions of the oscillating mass. The discussion includes assumptions about the nature of the forces at play and the conditions under which oscillation occurs.

SciencePF
Messages
55
Reaction score
0
Suppose a mass is oscillating attached to a spring in a horizontal surface with friction. Friction sooner or later will stop the oscillation. Does exists any possibility that the oscillating object stops at equilibrium position of that SHM, or it will stop elsewhere but never in the equilibrium position, i.e., x=0? TIA.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It's certain to stop at the equilibrium position. The reason SHM happens is because there's a restoring force that acts to return the particle to that position; as the system loses energy it can no longer store energy in the potential creating that force (e.g. gravity in the case of the simple pendulum), so the amplitude of oscillation dies off.
 
It need not stop at x=0 if there is static friction.
It will stop when the retarding kinetic friction force finally brings v to zero.
This could occur at x=0, as well as other x.
 
The retarding kinetic friction force is constant, so as the oscillator slows down, there will be a moment that the restoring force has a shorter value than kinetic friction force, and this never occur at origin, so i suppose it can't never stops at x=0.
 
If the frictional force exceeded the restoring force, the "oscillator" would never oscillate; when displaced by a small distance the frictional force would exceed the restoring force, and energy would stay stored in the stretched spring.
The force experienced by the particle isn't affected by its velocity; only by the spring constant and the instantaneous displacement; F=-kx.
 
SciencePF said:
The retarding kinetic friction force is constant, so as the oscillator slows down, there will be a moment that the restoring force has a shorter value than kinetic friction force, and this never occur at origin, so i suppose it can't never stops at x=0.
Not necessarily. The position where it stops will depend on where it starts. If the damping force is constant then there are two positions from which the oscillator is started and will stop at the origin.
 
Thanks to all who contribute to clarifying this question!

Astronuc:
What do you mean when you wrote this:
"If the damping force is constant then there are two positions from which the oscillator is started"

Thanks
 
There are two positions from equilibrium. For example, take a spring. The force could be tension or compression with a displace that is + or - from the equilibrium (zero displacement) point. In other words, there is a symmetry in SHM.
 
For me is difficult to understand why it can reach x=0 with friction.
Let´s explain if i understood:
When oscillating with friction there will be a moment where [tex]\mu[/tex]N=kx. and after that [tex]\mu[/tex]N>kx, so for the same spring the heavier the object the longer from the origin it will stop, unless when [tex]\mu[/tex]N=kx it has enough kinetic energy to dissipate and stop elsewhere, that can include point x=0! Is this interpretation correct?
 
  • #10
  • #11
SciencePF said:
When oscillating with friction there will be a moment where [tex]\mu[/tex]N=kx.

If this bit was right, there'd simply be no oscillation. That SHM has already started to occur is indicative that there is no such moment.

Remember that in SHM the energy contained by the system doesn't directly affect the force experienced by the particle. The particle doesn't stop because of frictional forces balancing the restoring force of the spring. That can happen, but then you don't get SHM.

What happens instead is that work is done against friction and energy is lost from the system. As the system loses energy, the mass has less energy to store as potential energy in the spring, so the amplitude of the oscillation dies off to zero.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
27
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
13
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K