Is There a Ratio Between Short Term and Continuous Current for Power Cables?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the relationship between short-term and continuous current ratings for power cables, particularly in the context of discharging a high-current capacitor module. Participants explore various calculations, recommendations for cable sizes, and the implications of shorting capacitors.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Experimental/applied

Main Points Raised

  • One participant inquires about a specific ratio between short-term and continuous current ratings for power cables, noting common generalizations of 5-10 times rated ampacity.
  • Another suggests that #2 AWG cable should suffice for the application.
  • Several participants provide a formula for determining the required conductor cross-section based on effective current, duration, and insulation material coefficient, with specific values for different materials.
  • Concerns are raised about the nature of capacitor discharge, with one participant stating that capacitors do not have a constant-current discharge curve and cautioning against shorting them directly.
  • Another participant recommends discharging the capacitor into a resistor and discusses the importance of calculating temperature rise in wires.
  • One participant revises their calculations using real RMS values, leading to a significantly smaller required cable size of approximately 40 mm².
  • References for the equations and coefficients used in calculations are provided, including sources from the Insulated Cable Engineers Association and electrical handbooks.
  • Discussion includes insights from participants with extensive electrical experience, noting that 2 AWG wire is close to the required size.
  • One participant mentions research on high-power applications, suggesting that variations in current can lead to losses and radiation issues in high-tension power cables.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the appropriate cable size and the implications of shorting capacitors. While some calculations suggest smaller sizes, others advocate for larger sizes based on safety and experience. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the optimal approach and specific recommendations.

Contextual Notes

There are limitations in the assumptions made regarding cable insulation materials and the specific conditions under which the calculations apply. The discussion also highlights the dependence on the current-time curve for accurate RMS calculations, which may vary based on the application.

rontruong
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
Hi guys,

I'm looking to find out if there is a ratio between short term and continuous current for power cables. I know that people usually generalize around 5-10 x rated ampacity, but I'm just asking around to see if there is a certain #. On McMaster Carr, the highest rated cable is for 600 AMPS continuous under welding cables. I will be needing to short a 125 VDC capacitor module that is estimated to put out 8000-9000 amps for less than 1 second.

Let me know if you guys need any other information.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Should be fine with something like #2 AWG.
 
For determination of cable withstands short time current following relation shall be considered:

S =( Ia.√t) / k

Where :

S : Conductor cross section in mm2
Ia: Effective (rms/amount of DC current) value of current (A)
t: duration of hazardous shock current (sec.)
k: Cable Insulation Material Coefficient:

For PVC-insulated CU conductors : k=115 As/mm2-
For PVC-insulated Al conductors : k=76 As/mm2-
For rubber-insulated CU conductors : k=141 As/mm2-

For your concerned case : t = 1 s , Ia=9000 A , k=115 (e.g.) the suitable cable size is S=78 mm2 and rated size is S=95 mm2


-----------------------------------------------------------------
Creative thinking is enjoyable, Then think about your surrounding things and other thought products. http://electrical-riddles.com
 
Last edited:
Capacitors don't have a constant-current discharge curve.
 
Capacitors don't like being shorted.

Discharge capacitor into a resistor.
A wire wound resistor is probably preferred for this application.

Probaly #16 wire will be Ok with any reasonably resistance resistor.

You can calculate the temperature rise of the wire, or much easier, just try it (being careful that if wire or resistor or capacitor explodes, no one is injured). If everything works OK, then maybe go to a higher wattage resistor and larger wire to have a safey factor.

Just out of curiosity, what are you using to short the capacitor?
 
For variable current functions, the rms value can be calculated as follow if we access to its current-time curve:

Ia = Irms = √ (1/T∫ i2 .dt)
 
m.s.j said:
For determination of cable withstands short time current following relation shall be considered:

S =( Ia.√t) / k

Where :

S : Conductor cross section in mm2
Ia: Effective (rms/amount of DC current) value of current (A)
t: duration of hazardous shock current (sec.)
k: Cable Insulation Material Coefficient:

For PVC-insulated CU conductors : k=115 As/mm2-
For PVC-insulated Al conductors : k=76 As/mm2-
For rubber-insulated CU conductors : k=141 As/mm2-

For your concerned case : t = 1 s , Ia=9000 A , k=115 (e.g.) the suitable cable size is S=78 mm2 and rated size is S=95 mm2-----------------------------------------------------------------
Creative thinking is enjoyable, Then think about your surrounding things and other thought products. http://electrical-riddles.com

Okay, I think I'm going to listen to you for simplicity reasons. With the 95 mm^2 results, then a size of 4/0 AWG copper cable should be sufficient. Can you show me where you got the equation and k values from, I need it for a presentation. Thank you for your help.

Carl Pugh said:
Capacitors don't like being shorted.

Discharge capacitor into a resistor.
A wire wound resistor is probably preferred for this application.

Probaly #16 wire will be Ok with any reasonably resistance resistor.

You can calculate the temperature rise of the wire, or much easier, just try it (being careful that if wire or resistor or capacitor explodes, no one is injured). If everything works OK, then maybe go to a higher wattage resistor and larger wire to have a safey factor.

Just out of curiosity, what are you using to short the capacitor?

Actually, the purpose of the test is to short the capacitor by itself. I know its dangerous, but for this company, the experiment is to determine if the capacitor module can survive a short circuit along with all the balance boards + monitoring boards.
 
m.s.j said:
For variable current functions, the rms value can be calculated as follow if we access to its current-time curve:

Ia = Irms = √ (1/T∫ i2 .dt)

I redid calculations with real RMS values and the cable size is much much smaller!

thanks for the help!
 
rontruong said:
I redid calculations with real RMS values and the cable size is much much smaller!

How much smaller?
 
  • #10
~40 mm^2 cross section

mostly because the current decays so fast after 1 time constant, so this makes sense.
 
  • #11
Can't beat 30 years electrical experience. 2 AWG wire has a cross-sectional area of ~34 mm2--close enough for government work.
 
  • #12
rontruong said:
Okay, Can you show me where you got the equation and k values from, I need it for a presentation. Thank you for your help.QUOTE]

References:

1- ICEA ( the Insulated Cable Engineers Association) P-45-482-1994

2- Electrical handbooks such as : " switching, protection and distribution in low voltage network" handbook of simense. Section 9.4.1.2
 
  • #13
ty :)
 
  • #14
Easy way to calculate cable temperature rise is to
Calculate energy stored in capacitor.
Calculate weight of copper (or aluminum) in cables).
Assume all the energy stored in capacitor is transferred to the copper in the cables.
 
  • #15
I believe there has been a good amount of research on this subject, mainly in High power radio, High power pulsed RADAR and I expect also in high energy physics work.

I know in High power radio transmitters, even continuous ones, the peak's of very high current and voltage (power) causes local and transient IR losses on the High Tension power cables feeding the transmitting valves.

This variation of the High Tension Voltage supply results in spurrious and parasidic radiation of the transmittion, because of the modulation effects of the varying High Tension supply.

..._____
___l_____l____

I know its not very clear, but that kind of arangement is used for parsidic suppression, it does not increase the total cross sectional area, but it reductes (by shorting out) the instanious losses to to high speed loads.
 

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
6K
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
5K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
9K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
10K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
13K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K