Should I re-read theory and errors or just go straight to practice?

  • Thread starter Thread starter cdux
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Errors Theory
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the question of whether to re-read theoretical notes or focus solely on practicing exercises in a subject that is primarily tested through practical application. Participants explore the value of reviewing theoretical material versus engaging with new exercises, considering the length and complexity of the notes involved.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Homework-related

Main Points Raised

  • One participant expresses uncertainty about the value of revisiting lengthy theoretical notes versus moving on to new exercises, suggesting a possible combination of both approaches.
  • Another participant questions the value of notes that are not shared, implying that the lack of specificity makes it difficult to assess their worth.
  • Some participants criticize the vagueness of the original question, suggesting that clearer details about the subject matter could lead to more structured responses.
  • One participant advises that if the topic is not grasped, the focus should be on practice, while if it is understood, one should move forward.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree that the original question lacks clarity, leading to varied interpretations and responses. There is no consensus on whether to prioritize theory or practice, as opinions differ on the best approach to studying.

Contextual Notes

The discussion highlights limitations in the original post's specificity, which affects the ability of participants to provide targeted advice. The complexity and length of the theoretical material are noted but not resolved in terms of their impact on study strategy.

cdux
Messages
187
Reaction score
0
I am interested in a subject that is only tested on exercises, however it has also a lengthy theory. I have gone through the theory and I have made notes on parts I wasn't aware of at first. I have also gone through the introductory exercises by myself and I have made notes on points I wasn't aware of at first. The length of that 'book' is quite, about 50 pages of convoluted notes and subnotes that may expand to other material or between one another.

The question is, is it of great value to go through those notes or go through new exercises only? Or should I combine it somehow?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
How would you answer the question "I made some notes that you can't see on a subject I won't name. Are they valuable?"
 
Vanadium 50 said:
How would you answer the question "I made some notes that you can't see on a subject I won't name. Are they valuable?"

I wouldn't assume I know every subject. This is academic guidance, not of a specific subject.

Anyway, thanks for making it clear you are more interested in being sarcastic. Bye.
 
cdux said:
I wouldn't assume I know every subject. This is academic guidance, not of a specific subject.

Anyway, thanks for making it clear you are more interested in being sarcastic. Bye.

You're being incredibly vague as is. Are you looking for study tips or just trying to cause a hard time?

It would help if you could be more specific about what you need help with ( maybe even include the topic you happen to be studying for ). Then perhaps you can receive a well structured response from somebody.
 
Having seen your prior posts, you're over thinking it. Think less and do more. If you don't grasp the topic, practice. If you get it, move on.

I agree with the other posters. OP's question is not clear nor answerable.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
4K
Replies
13
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 63 ·
3
Replies
63
Views
9K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
5K