Should I Shift by 1 or 4? Understanding Fourier Transform Time Shift

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion centers around the Fourier Transform of the signal x(t) = sin(4(t-1)). Participants are exploring the implications of time shifting in the context of Fourier Transforms, specifically whether to apply a shift of 1 or 4.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster questions whether to multiply the Fourier Transform of sin(4t) by e^(4jw) or e^(1jw), indicating uncertainty about the correct shift. Another participant suggests that the expression sin(4(t-1)) can be rewritten as sin(4t - 4), implying a shift by 4.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively engaging with the problem, with some providing insights into the nature of the shift. There is a recognition of differing conventions regarding imaginary numbers, but the main focus remains on the Fourier Transform and the associated shifts.

Contextual Notes

There is a mention of the distinction between 'i' and 'j' in the context of imaginary numbers, which may reflect a broader discussion about terminology in engineering versus mathematics.

EvLer
Messages
454
Reaction score
0
I am given this signal:
x(t) = sin(4(t-1))
and I need to find X(jw), i.e. it's FT, so I am confused whether I shift by 1 or by 4, in other words whether I multiply F{sin(4t)} by e^(4jw) or by e^(1jw)

which one is it? I am thinking it's 4jw... is it right?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Aarg! Those engineers and their jmaginary numbers!

I hope you will bear with me as I use "i" rather than "j". I just can't force myself to that heresy.

sin(4(t-1))= sin(4t- 4). Looks to me like you need to shift by 4.
 
HallsofIvy said:
Aarg! Those engineers and their jmaginary numbers!
:-p :biggrin:

thanks
 
a bit off topic

perhaps i should have started a different thread, but since HallsofIvy has mentioned, i couldn't help but ask: is there any tiniest difference between i and j, i.e. are we, engineers, underestimate imaginary numbers in some way?
It always comes up and i just would like to satisfy my curiosity.:bugeye:
 
Mr EvLer,

There is no big deal in taking j instead of i for imaginary numbers. For engineers, 'i' represents current. To avoid confusion engineers take 'j' for imaginary part.
 

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
8
Views
2K