Should I take solid state physics?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the decision to enroll in a solid state physics course using the Kittel textbook, particularly for an undergraduate student without formal quantum mechanics coursework. Participants confirm that while a foundational understanding of quantum mechanics (QM) is beneficial, the course primarily emphasizes statistical mechanics and conceptual understanding rather than heavy mathematical computations. Key topics to review before the course include the Fermi-Dirac distribution, the Schrödinger equation, and solving for a particle in a one-dimensional well.

PREREQUISITES
  • Familiarity with quantum mechanics concepts
  • Understanding of statistical mechanics principles
  • Knowledge of the Schrödinger equation
  • Ability to solve for a particle in a one-dimensional well
NEXT STEPS
  • Review the Fermi-Dirac distribution
  • Study the Schrödinger equation and its applications
  • Practice solving problems related to a particle in a one-dimensional well
  • Explore statistical mechanics concepts relevant to solid state physics
USEFUL FOR

Undergraduate physics students, particularly those interested in solid state physics and statistical mechanics, as well as anyone seeking to deepen their understanding of quantum mechanics applications in solid materials.

ZetaOfThree
Gold Member
Messages
109
Reaction score
23
I am an undergrad and for the most part I am looking for a good physics class to take. I am considering taking solid state physics at the level of Kittel as its one of the only physics classes offered at the undergrad level this semester that I haven't taken. I haven't taken quantum mechanics yet (it's not offered this semester), but I have a decent grasp of it from self-study. I mention this because quantum is a prereq. What things from quantum should I be solid with for studying solid state physics? Also, do you think solid state is interesting? I'm not really taking this class for research interests or anything, just to further my general knowledge of physics. I plan to talk to the professor about all this, but I am still curious of your opinions. What do you think?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Solid-State Physics (and the Kittel text) are incredibly interesting. One of my favorite classes. Even though solid-state physics is built on a foundation of QM, most of the math you use to solve problems is statistical mechanics and the rest is typically developed in the course. When I took it QM was used to develop the idea of quantum states in a periodic lattice, but after that explicit QM wasn't used much.

My guess is you'll do fine if you're at least familiar with QM, but yeah, ask the professor.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person
Solid State Physics is very worth it. It was my favorite class next to statistical mechanics; it is a class which is not about math and number crunching, but more about learning how to think about solids, much like statistical mechanics is a class about learning how to think about large systems. You learn something new every time.

You need to know how to solve for a particle in a 1-D well and know what the Schrödinger equation is though.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person
Thanks very much for the replies! I decided to enroll in the course but it doesn't start for a few days. What things from QM, stat mech, etc do you think it would be useful to review before the course starts?
 
Particle in a box. That is usually how they start in solid-state.
 
1. Fermi-Dirac distribution
2. Know what the Schrödinger equation is
3. Know how to solve it for a particle in a 1-D well.
 

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
5K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K