News Should the Geneva Conventions Apply to This War?

  • Thread starter Thread starter loseyourname
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Apply
Click For Summary
The discussion centers on the applicability of the Geneva Conventions in the current war, questioning whether the U.S. should be held to these standards when its enemy does not adhere to them. Participants argue that the conventions aim to protect civilians and that both sides should be accountable for their actions, regardless of the enemy's violations. There is a debate about the moral high ground, with some asserting that the U.S. must uphold these standards to contrast its actions with those of its adversaries. The conversation also touches on the historical context of the conventions and the challenges of enforcing them in modern warfare. Ultimately, the consensus leans towards the belief that adherence to the Geneva Conventions is a moral obligation, despite the complexities of the conflict.
  • #91
I've often voted for third-party candidates in the past and I think they add an important element to political dialogues, but I don't think we should completely demonize the two-party system. If every party was on equal footing, then we could end up with twenty or so relatively fringe parties, all catering to a particular special interest, perhaps even "one-issue" parties we have seen pop up in the past. You also have the obvious possibility, really a likelihood under such a system, that a president could be elected with as little as 20% or less of the popular vote. Such a president would not only be hard-pressed to accomplish anything with a congress likely made up of very divergent interests, but he/she would not be an accurate reflection of the American voting public. At least under the two-party system, each party is forced to turn somewhat to the middle and appeal to as large a number of people as is possible.

Yeah, it has its pros and cons. If the field fragmented too much that would likely be the worst case scenario, having at least 3 parties would give you an argumentation with other sides than "yes/no", "on/off" etc. (even though it would then probably be "don't know").
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 38 ·
2
Replies
38
Views
5K
  • · Replies 62 ·
3
Replies
62
Views
10K
  • · Replies 53 ·
2
Replies
53
Views
7K
  • · Replies 72 ·
3
Replies
72
Views
8K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
10K
  • · Replies 38 ·
2
Replies
38
Views
7K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 90 ·
4
Replies
90
Views
10K
  • · Replies 49 ·
2
Replies
49
Views
7K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K