Show f(x) >= g(x) given integral of f is >= g on any subinterval of [a,b]

  • Thread starter Thread starter afkguy
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Integral
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves continuous functions f and g defined on the interval [a,b], with the condition that the integral of f is greater than or equal to the integral of g for any subinterval [i,j] of [a,b]. The goal is to demonstrate that f(x) is greater than or equal to g(x) throughout the interval [a,b].

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the use of proof by contradiction and the implications of continuity for the functions involved. There is mention of exploring the relationship between the areas under the curves of f and g and how this relates to their values at specific points.

Discussion Status

Some participants have suggested using continuity properties and the concept of neighborhoods to explore the implications of the given integral condition. There is a recognition of the need to clarify certain assumptions and the potential for contradiction in the reasoning.

Contextual Notes

Participants are navigating the complexities of the problem, including the appropriateness of various mathematical theorems and the implications of continuity on the functions f and g. There is an acknowledgment of the challenge in selecting the right approach and the need for careful reasoning.

afkguy
Messages
16
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



f,g are cont. fcns on [a,b] and [tex]\int f[/tex] [tex]\geq[/tex] [tex]\int g[/tex] for any subinterval [i,j] of [a,b]. Show f(x) [tex]\geq[/tex] g(x) on [a,b].

Homework Equations



Don't know if I should have used something like the fundamental theorem or mean value of integrals or something. I was using theorems like those for other problems in this section but wasn't sure about this one so I took a different direction.

The Attempt at a Solution



Assume that this isn't true, i.e., there exists some c in [a,b] s.t. g(c) > f(c).

f and g are continuous so let's choose our [tex]\epsilon[/tex] = g(c) - f(c), so there should exist some [tex]\delta[/tex] > 0 where:

|f(x) - f(c)| < [tex]\epsilon[/tex] whenever |x - c| < [tex]\delta[/tex]

Thus 2f(c) - g(c) < f(x) < g(c) when x is in (c - [tex]\delta[/tex], c + [tex]\delta[/tex])

So f(x) < g(c) whenever x is in (c - [tex]\delta[/tex], c + [tex]\delta[/tex]).

So consider any partition p of any subinterval [i,j] of [a,b] where the one of the subintervals of [i,j] is (c - [tex]\delta[/tex], c + [tex]\delta[/tex]).

I stopped here because I'm pretty sure I chose the wrong epsilon and I wasn't really sure if I was even in the right direction.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
well i am not sure how you would go about 'proving' this but knowing that the area of f is always greater than or equal to g on any sub interval [i,j] in the interval [a,b] implies that f never intersects g, they may touch and be equal but f will never be less than g because the area would be less on the sub interval [i,j] where f<g. The fact that this is true with any sub interval (implying infinitesimal intervals as well) means that f>=g.
 
Proof by contradiction is a good strategy here and you had good ideas, but you are muddling yourself up by dealing with details that we don't need, such as finding epsilons.

1) Assume g(c) > f(c) for some c in [a,b]
2) Use the continuity property to deduce there is some neighborhood (c - e, c + e) ( e>0 ) where g > f in that neighborhood.
3) Consider the integral over this interval to find a contradiction.
 
To prove 2) stated above use the function g(x)-f(x) which is also continuous and you know it has a positive limit at x=c.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K