Show that Complex-differentiable functions are always Real-diff.

  • Thread starter Thread starter Maybe_Memorie
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Functions
Click For Summary
Complex-differentiable functions must satisfy the Cauchy-Riemann equations, which relate the partial derivatives of their real and imaginary components. The discussion revolves around proving that if a function is complex-differentiable, it is also real-differentiable by applying these equations. The user initially struggles with the definitions of differentiability but realizes that both the real and imaginary parts can be analyzed separately. They conclude that demonstrating the differentiability of the complex function in terms of its real components leads back to the Cauchy-Riemann equations. This understanding reinforces the connection between complex and real differentiability.
Maybe_Memorie
Messages
346
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



"Show that Complex-differentiable functions are always Real-differetiable."

I missed the lecture where the proof of this was given and I'm trying to figure it out.

Homework Equations



Cauchy-Riemann, ux = vy, uy = -vx

The Attempt at a Solution



Suppose a function f(z) = u + iv is C-differentiable, so it satisfies the Cauchy-Riemann equations everywhere. So ux = vy, uy = -vx at all points.

A function f(x,y) is R-differentiable if f(x,y) = f(x0,y0) + f(x0, y0)(x-x0)(y-y0) + O(Δx,Δy)
and O is such that O(Δx,Δy)/(||(Δx,Δy)||) -> 0 as ||(Δx,Δy)|| -> 0.

Firstly, my notes are a bit sketchy so it's possible my definition of R-diff is wrong.

I'm not really sure how to use the C-R equations with this definition either. It's not as if I can just substitute some stuff into get the required result...

Any hints/tips/suggestions?


Edit: Oh wait, I just realized I can apply to definition to R-diff to both u and v, since they're both functions of x and y. Will report back with where this leads.

Edit 2: That didn't really go anywhere. I realized I should be using the C-R equations to show that f satisfies the definition of R-diff.

I'm kind of lost.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Write down what it means that f is differentiable as a complex function in the same way as you did for differentiability as a function f:\mathbb{R}^2 \rightarrow \mathbb{C}. Then express the differentiability criterion in the sense of a complex function in terms of the real and imaginary parts.
 
Okay, for f to be differentiable as a complex function means that the limit
f'(z0) = lim, z->z0 [f(z) - f(z0)/(z - z0) exists.

This has led me to believe that the question is basically a fancy way of asking for the derivation of the C-R equations, or at least the first half of it.

Is that correct? I can express z, z0 in terms of x,y etc, and then just apply the conditions of R-differentiability to the real and imaginary parts, and I'll eventually just end up with the Cauchy-Riemann equations.
 
Question: A clock's minute hand has length 4 and its hour hand has length 3. What is the distance between the tips at the moment when it is increasing most rapidly?(Putnam Exam Question) Answer: Making assumption that both the hands moves at constant angular velocities, the answer is ## \sqrt{7} .## But don't you think this assumption is somewhat doubtful and wrong?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
26
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K