Show that p choose n=0 when n>p

  • Thread starter Thread starter Potatochip911
  • Start date Start date
Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
1 reply · 2K views
Potatochip911
Messages
317
Reaction score
3

Homework Statement


Show that if p is a positive integer, then ##\binom{p}{n}=0## when ##n>p##, so ##(1+x)^p=\sum \binom{p}{n} x^n ##, is just a sum of ##p+1## terms, from ##n=0## to ##n=p##. For example ##(1+x)^2## has 3 terms, ##(1+x)^3## has 4 terms, etc. This is just the familiar binomial theorem.

Homework Equations


3. The Attempt at a Solution [/B]
$$\binom{p}{n}=\frac{p(p-1)(p-2)\cdots(p-n+2)(p-n+1)}{n!} $$ Since n>p I figured I would test with (p+1) to see what happens. $$\binom{p}{p+1}=\frac{p(p-1)(p-2)\cdots(p-(p+1)+2)(p-(p+1)+1)}{(p+1)!}$$ So the last term clearly goes to zero. Is rewriting ##\binom{p}{n}=0## as $$\frac{(p-n+1)(p-n+2)(p-n+3)(p-n+4)\cdots p}{n!} $$ sufficient for proving this? I am also quite lost as to what they're implying with $$(1+x)^p=\sum \binom{p}{n} x^n $$ I understand that there is always ##(p+1)## terms after expanding a binomial raised to a power but by the sum are they referring to if the binomial was rewritten as a Maclaurin series?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You are so close! You have already [itex] \begin{pmatrix}<br /> p\\<br /> n\\<br /> \end{pmatrix}=\frac{p(p-1)(p-2)\dotso (p-n+1)}{n!}[/itex]. Therefore [itex] \begin{pmatrix}<br /> p\\<br /> p\\<br /> \end{pmatrix}=\frac{p(p-1)(p-2)\dotso (p-p+1)}{p!}=1[/itex] and [itex] \begin{pmatrix}<br /> p\\<br /> p+1\\<br /> \end{pmatrix}=\frac{p(p-1)(p-2)\dotso (p-(p+1)+1)}{(p+1)!}=0[/itex]. So, for n≥(p+1), you have one factor = 0, therefore the product is 0.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Potatochip911