Show that the energy-momentum tensor has the following matrix structure

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on deriving the energy-momentum tensor's matrix structure, specifically addressing the calculation of the component T^{11}. The user initially miscalculated T^{11} as ##\frac{1}{4 \pi}(E^2_x+B^2_z+B^2_y-\frac{1}{4} (\textbf{E}^2+\textbf{B}^2))## instead of the correct form ##\frac{1}{4 \pi}(E^2_x+B^2_x-\frac{1}{4} (\textbf{E}^2+\textbf{B}^2))##. Key errors included sign issues and a missing factor of two in the derivation. After receiving guidance, the user successfully corrected their calculations and derived the correct form as per the task sheet.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of the energy-momentum tensor in the context of electromagnetism
  • Familiarity with tensor notation and operations in special relativity
  • Knowledge of electromagnetic field tensors, specifically ##F^{\mu \nu}##
  • Proficiency in manipulating mathematical expressions involving vectors and matrices
NEXT STEPS
  • Review the derivation of the energy-momentum tensor in electromagnetism
  • Study the properties and applications of the electromagnetic field tensor ##F^{\mu \nu}##
  • Learn about the significance of the Minkowski metric ##\eta^{\mu \nu}## in tensor calculations
  • Explore common pitfalls in tensor calculus, particularly sign errors and factor discrepancies
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, particularly those specializing in electromagnetism and general relativity, as well as students and researchers working on theoretical physics problems involving the energy-momentum tensor.

Lambda96
Messages
233
Reaction score
77
Homework Statement
Show that the energy-momentum tensor has the following matrix structure (see post)
Relevant Equations
none
Hi,

the task is as follows
Bildschirmfoto 2025-01-08 um 21.56.05.png

I had no problems deriving the expressions ##\omega##, ##\frac{\textbf{S}}{c}## and ##\frac{\textbf{S}^T}{c}##, but now I have problems showing -{## \sigma_{ij}##}. I assumed the following for the calculation:

$$F^{\mu \sigma} F_{\ \sigma}^{\! \nu}=\sum\limits_{\sigma=0}^{3}F^{\mu \sigma} F_{\ \sigma}^{\! \nu}$$

$$F^{\sigma \rho}F_{\sigma \rho}=\sum\limits_{\sigma=0}^{3}\sum\limits_{\rho=0}^{3} F^{\sigma \rho}F_{\sigma \rho}$$

But if I now calculate ##T^{11}##, I get ##\frac{1}{4 \pi}(E^2_x+B^2_z+B^2_y-\frac{1}{4} (\textbf{E}^2+\textbf{B}^2))## according to the definition of the task sheet for -{## \sigma_{ij}##}, i should get the following result ##\frac{1}{4 \pi}(E^2_x+B^2_x-\frac{1}{4} (\textbf{E}^2+\textbf{B}^2))##. Is the definition wrong or have I done something wrong?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
You have done something wrong. Without actually being provided with your derivation it is impossible to determine what.
 
Sorry, here is my calculation

$$\begin{align*}
T^{11}&=\frac{1}{4 \pi}(F^{10}F_{\ 0}^{\! 1}+F^{11}F_{\ 1}^{\! 1}+F^{12}F_{\ 2}^{\! 1}+F^{13}F_{\ 3}^{\! 1}+\frac{1}{4}\eta^{11}2(B^2-E^2))\\
T^{11}&=\frac{1}{4 \pi}(E_x E_x+B_z B_z+B_yB_y-\frac{1}{4} (\textbf{E}^2+\textbf{B}^2))\\
T^{11}&=\frac{1}{4 \pi}(E^2_x+B^2_z+B^2_y-\frac{1}{4} (\textbf{E}^2+\textbf{B}^2))
\end{align*}$$

With ##F^{\mu \nu}=\left( \begin{array}{rrr}
0 & -E_x & -E_y & -E_z\\\
E_x & 0 & -B_z & B_y\\
E_y & B_z & 0 & -B_x\\
E_z & -B_y & B_x & 0\\\
\end{array}\right)## and ##\eta^{\mu \nu}=\left( \begin{array}{rrr}
1 & 0 & 0 & 0\\
0 & -1 & 0 & 0\\
0 & 0 & -1 & 0 \\
0 & 0 & 0 & -1\\
\end{array}\right)##
 
It is unclear what happens with the invariant ##B^2 - E^2## in the second step.
 
I don't know why I wrote it this way, but it should actually look like this :smile:

$$\begin{align*}
T^{11}&=\frac{1}{4 \pi}(F^{10}F_{\ 0}^{\! 1}+F^{11}F_{\ 1}^{\! 1}+F^{12}F_{\ 2}^{\! 1}+F^{13}F_{\ 3}^{\! 1}+\frac{1}{4}\eta^{11}2(\textbf{B}^2-\textbf{E}^2))\\
T^{11}&=\frac{1}{4 \pi}(E_x E_x+B_z B_z+B_yB_y-\frac{1}{4} (\textbf{B}^2-\textbf{E}^2))\\
T^{11}&=\frac{1}{4 \pi}(E^2_x+B^2_z+B^2_y-\frac{1}{4} (\textbf{B}^2-\textbf{E}^2))
\end{align*}$$
 
You dropped the factor of 2, and you seem to have made a sign error calculating ##F^{1\mu}F^1{}_\mu##.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Lambda96
There are quite some sign issues, be very careful of those. Once you get the signs correctly (and the factor of two), you should note that you can rewrite ##B_y^2 + B_z^2 = {\bf B}^2 - B_x^2## and things will fall into place.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Lambda96
Thank you vela and Orodruin for your help 👍👍, I was now able to derive the form as shown on the task sheet :smile:
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
7K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K