Show that the energy-momentum tensor has the following matrix structure

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around deriving the energy-momentum tensor's matrix structure in the context of electromagnetic fields, specifically focusing on the components related to the electromagnetic field tensor.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the derivation of specific components of the energy-momentum tensor, questioning the correctness of definitions and calculations. There are attempts to clarify the expressions used and the implications of sign errors in the calculations.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively engaging with each other's calculations, pointing out potential errors and suggesting corrections. Some have expressed gratitude for the assistance received, indicating progress in understanding the derivation process.

Contextual Notes

There are indications of confusion regarding the invariant terms and the treatment of signs in the calculations. Participants are also addressing the need for careful consideration of factors in their derivations.

Lambda96
Messages
233
Reaction score
77
Homework Statement
Show that the energy-momentum tensor has the following matrix structure (see post)
Relevant Equations
none
Hi,

the task is as follows
Bildschirmfoto 2025-01-08 um 21.56.05.png

I had no problems deriving the expressions ##\omega##, ##\frac{\textbf{S}}{c}## and ##\frac{\textbf{S}^T}{c}##, but now I have problems showing -{## \sigma_{ij}##}. I assumed the following for the calculation:

$$F^{\mu \sigma} F_{\ \sigma}^{\! \nu}=\sum\limits_{\sigma=0}^{3}F^{\mu \sigma} F_{\ \sigma}^{\! \nu}$$

$$F^{\sigma \rho}F_{\sigma \rho}=\sum\limits_{\sigma=0}^{3}\sum\limits_{\rho=0}^{3} F^{\sigma \rho}F_{\sigma \rho}$$

But if I now calculate ##T^{11}##, I get ##\frac{1}{4 \pi}(E^2_x+B^2_z+B^2_y-\frac{1}{4} (\textbf{E}^2+\textbf{B}^2))## according to the definition of the task sheet for -{## \sigma_{ij}##}, i should get the following result ##\frac{1}{4 \pi}(E^2_x+B^2_x-\frac{1}{4} (\textbf{E}^2+\textbf{B}^2))##. Is the definition wrong or have I done something wrong?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
You have done something wrong. Without actually being provided with your derivation it is impossible to determine what.
 
Sorry, here is my calculation

$$\begin{align*}
T^{11}&=\frac{1}{4 \pi}(F^{10}F_{\ 0}^{\! 1}+F^{11}F_{\ 1}^{\! 1}+F^{12}F_{\ 2}^{\! 1}+F^{13}F_{\ 3}^{\! 1}+\frac{1}{4}\eta^{11}2(B^2-E^2))\\
T^{11}&=\frac{1}{4 \pi}(E_x E_x+B_z B_z+B_yB_y-\frac{1}{4} (\textbf{E}^2+\textbf{B}^2))\\
T^{11}&=\frac{1}{4 \pi}(E^2_x+B^2_z+B^2_y-\frac{1}{4} (\textbf{E}^2+\textbf{B}^2))
\end{align*}$$

With ##F^{\mu \nu}=\left( \begin{array}{rrr}
0 & -E_x & -E_y & -E_z\\\
E_x & 0 & -B_z & B_y\\
E_y & B_z & 0 & -B_x\\
E_z & -B_y & B_x & 0\\\
\end{array}\right)## and ##\eta^{\mu \nu}=\left( \begin{array}{rrr}
1 & 0 & 0 & 0\\
0 & -1 & 0 & 0\\
0 & 0 & -1 & 0 \\
0 & 0 & 0 & -1\\
\end{array}\right)##
 
It is unclear what happens with the invariant ##B^2 - E^2## in the second step.
 
I don't know why I wrote it this way, but it should actually look like this :smile:

$$\begin{align*}
T^{11}&=\frac{1}{4 \pi}(F^{10}F_{\ 0}^{\! 1}+F^{11}F_{\ 1}^{\! 1}+F^{12}F_{\ 2}^{\! 1}+F^{13}F_{\ 3}^{\! 1}+\frac{1}{4}\eta^{11}2(\textbf{B}^2-\textbf{E}^2))\\
T^{11}&=\frac{1}{4 \pi}(E_x E_x+B_z B_z+B_yB_y-\frac{1}{4} (\textbf{B}^2-\textbf{E}^2))\\
T^{11}&=\frac{1}{4 \pi}(E^2_x+B^2_z+B^2_y-\frac{1}{4} (\textbf{B}^2-\textbf{E}^2))
\end{align*}$$
 
You dropped the factor of 2, and you seem to have made a sign error calculating ##F^{1\mu}F^1{}_\mu##.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Lambda96
There are quite some sign issues, be very careful of those. Once you get the signs correctly (and the factor of two), you should note that you can rewrite ##B_y^2 + B_z^2 = {\bf B}^2 - B_x^2## and things will fall into place.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Lambda96
Thank you vela and Orodruin for your help 👍👍, I was now able to derive the form as shown on the task sheet :smile:
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
1K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
7K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K