Show that the given electric field is a plane wave

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on demonstrating that a given electric field represents a plane wave. It begins with the definition of a wavefront and the manipulation of the cosine argument to establish a relationship involving position and time. A participant identifies an error in the rearrangement of the equation but acknowledges that it resembles the scalar equation of a plane. The conversation confirms that the derived equation indeed indicates a plane wave, emphasizing the simplicity of the conclusion. Overall, the participants agree on the relationship between the equation and the characteristics of a plane wave.
Blanchdog
Messages
56
Reaction score
22
Homework Statement
Show that each wavefront of the electric field forms a plane
Relevant Equations
## E(r, t) = E_0 \text{cos}(k(\hat{u} \cdot r - c t) + \phi)##
A wavefront is defined as a surface in space where the argument of the cosine has a constant value. So I set the argument of the cosine to an arbitrary constant s.

## k(\hat{u} \cdot r - c t) + \phi = s ##

The positional information is is in r, so I rearrange the equation to be

## \hat{u} \cdot r = \frac s k + ct + \phi = \text{const}##
## u_x x + u_y y + u_z z = \text{const} ##

And that's where I'm stuck.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You made a small error in the rearrangement, but once corrected the last line is almost right; that's the general equation of a plane of normal ##\hat{n}##, but ##\hat{u} \cdot r## depends on ##t## so isn't constant in time (that's why the plane translates).
 
ergospherical said:
You made a small error in the rearrangement, but once corrected the last line is almost right; that's the general equation of a plane of normal ##\hat{n}##, but ##\hat{u} \cdot r## depends on ##t## so isn't constant in time (that's why the plane translates).
Whoops you're right, I wasn't very careful with my minus signs since I knew it was all going to be wrapped up into a constant anyway.

It looks like my equation is in the form of the scalar equation of a plane... is it really that simple? I have the equation of a plane so it is a plane wave?
 
  • Like
Likes DaveE and ergospherical
Blanchdog said:
It looks like my equation is in the form of the scalar equation of a plane... is it really that simple? I have the equation of a plane so it is a plane wave?
Yeah, pretty much 😄
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Back
Top