Show that wave packet is an eigenstate to operator

Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
2 replies · 3K views
Bapelsin
Messages
12
Reaction score
0
Show that wave packet is an eigenstate to operator [SOLVED]

Homework Statement



For a harmonic oscillator we can define the step up and down operators [tex]\hat{a}[/tex] and [tex]\hat{a}^{\dagger}[/tex] and their action as

[tex]\hat{a}=\sqrt{\frac{m\omega}{2\hbar}}(\hat{x}+\frac{\imath}{m\omega}\hat{p}) \quad \hat{a}|n\rangle = \sqrt{n}|n-1\rangle[/tex]

[tex]\hat{a}^{\dagger}=\sqrt{\frac{m\omega}{2\hbar}}(\hat{x}-\frac{\imath}{m\omega}\hat{p}) \quad \hat{a}^{\dagger}|n\rangle = \sqrt{n+1}|n+1\rangle[/tex]

Show that the Gaussian wave-packet

[tex]\Psi(x)=\left(\frac{m\omega}{\pi\hbar}\right)^{1/4}e^{-\frac{m\omega}{2\hbar}(x-x_t)^2+\frac{\imath}{\hbar}p_t(x-x_t)}[/tex]

is an eigenstate to [tex]\hat{a}[/tex] with eigenvalue [tex]\alpha[/tex].
[tex]\hat{a}|a\rangle = \alpha | a\rangle[/tex]

Express the eigenvalue in terms of [tex]x_t[/tex] and [tex]p_t[/tex].

Homework Equations



See above.

The Attempt at a Solution



[tex]\hat{p} \rightarrow -i\hbar\frac{\partial}{\partial x}[/tex]

gives the expression for

[tex]\hat{a}=\sqrt{\frac{m\omega}{2\hbar}}(\hat{x}+\frac{\hbar}{m\omega}\frac{\partial}{\partial x})[/tex]

[tex]\hat{a}|\Psi\rangle = \sqrt{\frac{m\omega}{2\hbar}} \left(\frac{m\omega}{\pi\hbar}\right)^{1/4}\left(e^{-\frac{m\omega}{2\hbar}(x-x_t)^2+\frac{\imath}{\hbar}p_t(x-x_t)} + \frac{\hbar}{m\omega}(-\frac{m\omega}{\hbar}(x-x_t)+\frac{\imath}{\hbar}p_t(e^{-\frac{m\omega}{2\hbar}(x-x_t)^2+\frac{\imath}{\hbar}p_t(x-x_t)})\right) = <br /> \Psi\sqrt{\frac{m\omega}{2\hbar}}\left(1+(x-x_t)+\frac{\imath}{m\omega}p_t\right)[/tex]

which is obviously not a scalar times [tex]\Psi[/tex].

What am I doing wrong here?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
You forgot the x in the first term in parentheses (which comes from the x operator multiplied by Psi).

Here, cut out the clutter (h is supposed to be hbar in what follows):

C = (mω/h)1/2

A = (h/mω)

Then:

a|Ψ> = C(x + A ∂/∂x)Ψ

= C(xΨ + A∂Ψ/∂x)

= C(xΨ + A[(-mω/h)(x-xt) + (i/h)pt]Ψ)

=C(xΨ + A[-A-1xΨ + A-1xtΨ + (i/h)ptΨ])

See anything that might cancel?