Show the gravitional field is conservative

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The gravitational field is confirmed to be conservative through the scalar function defined as f(x,y,z) = MM'G/√(x²+y²+z²). The gradient of this function, ∇f(x,y,z), results in the force vector F(x, y, z) expressed as -MM'G/(x²+y²+z²)^(3/2) in the Cartesian coordinate system. The use of the inverse distance is essential as it accurately represents the gravitational force, while alternative definitions fail to yield the correct force representation.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of vector calculus concepts
  • Familiarity with scalar and vector fields
  • Knowledge of gravitational force equations
  • Basic proficiency in Cartesian coordinates
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of conservative fields in physics
  • Explore the derivation of gravitational force from potential energy
  • Learn about the implications of scalar functions in physics
  • Investigate the role of gradient operators in vector calculus
USEFUL FOR

Students of physics, mathematicians specializing in calculus, and educators teaching vector calculus concepts will benefit from this discussion.

Physics2341313
Messages
53
Reaction score
0
In my calculus textbook (section on vector calc) it is showing that the gravitational field is conservative. I followed fine except for the first part, defining the scalar function f.

Showing the field is conservative went something like this:

[itex]f(x,y,z) = MM'G/\sqrt{x^2+y^2+z^2}[/itex]
[itex]\nabla{f(x,y,z)} = \partial{f}/\partial{x}\hat{i}+\partial{f}/\partial{y}\hat{j}+\partial{f}/\partial{z}\hat{k}[/itex]
[itex]= -MM'G/(x^2+y^2+z^2)^{3/2}\hat{i} + -MM'G/(x^2+y^2+z^2)^{3/2}\hat{j} + -MM'G/(x^2+y^2+z^2)^{3/2}\hat{k}[/itex]
= F(x, y, z)

Why, when defining the scalar function f is the [itex]\sqrt{x^2 + y^2 + z^2}[/itex] used?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It is the distance in cartesian coordinates.
Why the inverse distance and not its square or something else? Well, the inverse distance leads to the right force, other definitions do not.
 

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K