Showing discontinuity at infinitely many points

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The function f: ℝ → ℝ, which takes each value exactly twice, is proven to be discontinuous at infinitely many points. The argument hinges on the properties of continuous functions, specifically that a nonconstant continuous function maps intervals to intervals. If f were continuous, it would attain every value between its maximum and minimum at least twice, leading to a contradiction. This establishes that f cannot be continuous and must be discontinuous at infinitely many points.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of real-valued functions and their properties.
  • Knowledge of continuity and discontinuity in mathematical analysis.
  • Familiarity with the Intermediate Value Theorem.
  • Basic concepts of intervals in ℝ.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the Intermediate Value Theorem and its implications for continuous functions.
  • Explore examples of discontinuous functions and their characteristics.
  • Learn about the properties of functions that are defined on the entire real line.
  • Investigate the implications of functions taking on values multiple times.
USEFUL FOR

Mathematics students, particularly those studying real analysis, and educators looking to deepen their understanding of function continuity and discontinuity.

delta_epsilon
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Suppose f: ℝ → ℝ takes on each of its values exactly twice; that is, for each y in ℝ, the set {x: y = f(x)} has either 0 or 2 elements. Show that f is discontinuous at infinitely many points.

Homework Equations



I don't know if this is relevant, but in the prior text to this problem, this was perhaps the only one that may be relevant:

If I is an interval in ℝ and if f: I → ℝ is a nonconstant continuous function, then f(I) is an interval. In particular, if a,b in I with f(a) ≠f(b), then f assumes every value between f(a) and f(b)

The Attempt at a Solution



I've tried going through definitions, theorems, etc. for several hours of the course of 3 days and I am still totally stumped. Ugh. Please, any help is much appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I'd like to note how close f=|x| comes to breaking this!

So, I can get that the function isn't continuous, and perhaps this will help and perhaps it won't. Suppose it were continuous, and let y be in the range of f. Then consider I=[x_1,x_2] where f(x_1)=f(x_2)=y. Now, on I f attains a max, say m=f(x_3). Now, since f is continuous, f attains every value between y and m at least twice, once in [x_1,x_3] and once in [x_3,x_2]. Also, it can't attain m again on this interval or else you break the hypotheses, as values will be attained more than twice. Thus it attains m again somewhere outside the interval, and you should get that you attain values three times.

If this observation hasn't been made, perhaps you can tweek it to win the problem, though I'm not positive you can or cannot.
 
The fact that this function maps all of R to all of R is crucial. Otherwise, just take f(x)= |x| for x not 0, f undefined at 0 as a counter example.
 
HallsofIvy said:
The fact that this function maps all of R to all of R is crucial. Otherwise, just take f(x)= |x| for x not 0, f undefined at 0 as a counter example.

So are you saying blinktx411 solution is incorrect?
 
He's shown that the curve must be discontinuous but not that it must be discontinuous at infinitely many points.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 39 ·
2
Replies
39
Views
6K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
6K
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K