Showing geometric multiplicity is the same for two similar Matrices

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around proving that two similar matrices, A and B, have the same geometric multiplicity for a given eigenvalue (mu). The original poster attempts to establish that if (mu) is an eigenvalue of A with geometric multiplicity g, then it must also have geometric multiplicity g as an eigenvalue of B, leveraging the properties of similar matrices.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the relationship between the eigenvectors of A and B, particularly how the eigenvectors of B can be transformed into those of A using the similarity transformation. There is a focus on demonstrating that the eigenvectors span the eigenspace for A. Some participants question how to logically show that an arbitrary vector w in the eigenspace of A can be expressed as a linear combination of the transformed eigenvectors.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants providing hints and suggestions. One participant emphasizes the importance of the invertibility of S and proposes a method to express w as a linear combination of the eigenvectors of B. Another participant offers a more straightforward approach by relating the eigenvalue multiplicity to the characteristic polynomial, suggesting that the properties of eigenvalues are preserved under similarity transformations.

Contextual Notes

There is an underlying assumption that the matrices involved are of the same size and that the properties of eigenvalues and their multiplicities are being examined in the context of linear transformations represented by similar matrices.

Muffins
Messages
5
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Suppose A and B are similar matrices, and that (mu) is an eigenvalue of A. We know that (mu) is also an eigenvalue of B, with the same algebraic multiplicity(proved in class) Suppose that g is the geometric multiplicity of (mu), as an eigenvalue of B. Show that (mu) has geometric multiplicity g as an eigenvalue of A.

Homework Equations



A=S*B*S^-1
B=S^-1 *A*S

The Attempt at a Solution



We know that g = dim(EigenSpace of (mu) for (B)), so this tells us that the space has a basis
(v1, v2, ... , vg)
From our previously worked problem, we know that if A and B are similar, an v is an eigenvector for B, then S*v is an eigenvector for B, so it follows that
(Sv1, Sv2, ... , Svg) are eigenvectors for A. Now to verify that this is a basis of A, we need to show that they are linearly independent and span (EgienSpace of (mu) for A).
So, (c1*S*v1 + c2*S*v2 + ... + cg*S*vg) = 0 vector, factor out an S and we get
S*(c1*v1 + c2*v2 + ... + cg*vg) = 0 vector, and because the v's form a basis they're linearly independent, forcing the c's to be 0.
Here's where my troubles hit. I'm entirely confused as to how to show (S*v1, ... S*vg) span the eigenspace(mu) for A. My professor suggested to take an arbitrary vector w, which is an element of the eigenspace(mu) for A, and show that the w is a linear combination of the S*v's.. but I'm at a loss on how to logically show that.

Any help will be greatly appreciated guys!
Thank you mucho!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hint: S is invertible.
 
So something like this?

We want to show that w is a linear combination of (Sv1, Sv2, ... ,Svg)
which says we have

c1*S*v1 + c2*S*v2 + ... + cg*S*vg = w

we can pull out the S...

S(c1v1 + c2v2 + ... + cgvg) = w

S^-1(S(c1v1 + c2v2 + ... + cgvg) = S^-1*w
(c1v1 + c2v2 + ... + cgvg) = S^-1 * w?

I tried going on a path similar to this last night but I wasn't seeing how this could show w is a linear combination of the S*v's... What am I still missing...?
 
I don't think you need to be that complicated. Saying that \mu is an eigenvalue of A of multiplicity n basically means that (A- \mu I)^n= 0, where I and 0 are, of course, the identity and zero matrices of the same size as A. Now, if B is similar to A, B= SAS-1 and A= S-1BS for some invertible matrix, just as you say! Replace A in the previous equation by that and show that (B- \mu I)^n= 0 also.

Conceptually, of course, if A and B are similar matrices then they represent the same linear transformation written in different bases. "Eigenvalues" and "multiplicity of eigenvalues" are properties of the linear transformations not just specific representations so are the same for similar matrices.
 

Similar threads

Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
8K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
17
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K