Showing Greens First Theorem Integral is 0

  • Thread starter Thread starter EngageEngage
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Functions
Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
5 replies · 3K views
EngageEngage
Messages
203
Reaction score
0
[SOLVED] Greens Functions

Homework Statement


show:
[tex]\int\int\int_{D}\vec{F}\cdot\vec{G}dV = 0[/tex]
where:
[tex]\vec{F}=\nabla\phi[/tex]
[tex]\vec{G}=\nabla\psi[/tex]
[tex]\nabla\cdot\vec{F}=0[/tex]
[tex]\psi|_{\partial D}=0[/tex]

The Attempt at a Solution


This looks like a problem for Greens first theorem:

[tex]\int\int\int_{D}\phi\nabla^{2}\psi dV = \int\int_{\partial D}\phi\nabla\psi dS - \int\int\int_{D}\nabla\psi\cdot\nabla\phi dV[/tex]

The very right term is clearly the integral that I'm looking for. So, i will set it to look like the requested answer. Also, I know that
[tex]\psi|_{\partial D}=0[/tex]
meaning that I can also throw out the second term because that term wants me to integrate the gradient of psi over the surface, while I know that psi is 0 over the surface. So, I am left with this:

[tex]\int\int\int_{D}\phi\nabla^{2}\psi dV = - \int\int\int_{D}\vec{F}\cdot\vec{G} dV[/tex]

So, this means that the term on the left mus equal zero. Does anyone know how I can show this? Psi is not zero through the domain, and the problem doesn't specify that it is a harmonic potential (although I suppose it could be). Could someone please help me with this step? Any help at all is greatly appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Uh, phi is given to be harmonic, not psi. Since the divergence of it's gradient is zero. Why don't you move the laplacian operator over to phi?
 
Last edited:
Thanks for the help! This will also eliminate the middle term anyways too, since psi will be zero there on the boundary, right?
 
thanks a lot for the help Dick