Showing that a series of numbers has an infinite amount of composites

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around demonstrating that an infinite series of numbers, specifically 11, 101, 1001, 10001, and 100001, contains composite numbers. The original poster attempts to show that certain forms of these numbers are divisible by 11, particularly through the expression 10^n + 1.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the divisibility of numbers in the series by 11 and explore polynomial factorization as a means to demonstrate this. There are attempts to use induction and factorization techniques, with questions raised about finding proper divisors and the implications of polynomial roots.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively engaging with the problem, offering hints and guidance on polynomial factorization. Some express uncertainty about their reasoning, while others provide encouragement and clarification on the steps needed to show the divisibility of the numbers in question.

Contextual Notes

There is an emphasis on understanding polynomial expressions and their factors, particularly in relation to odd powers. Participants are navigating the constraints of proving divisibility without relying solely on numeric factorization.

basik156
Messages
9
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Show that infinitely many of the numbers

11, 101, 1001, 10001, 100001,...

are composite

Homework Equations


The Attempt at a Solution


So by inspecting these numbers, I notice that 11, 1001, 100001 are all divisible by 11.
The numbers can be represented at 10[itex]^{n}[/itex]+1
and when n=2k+1 where k is an integer, this number is divisible by 11, thus having a proper divisor less than √n and thus being composite.

So I know this, but I don't think I've really shown that the number is divisible by 11, I have just noticed this fact. I attempted a solution by induction, but something tells me there is a better way to show this.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If I were able to prove that 10^n +1 has any proper divisor less than √10^n+1 then I have shown the claim. How to do this is where I'm at a wall...
 
1001=10^3+1. Can you show me that has a divisor of 11 without doing the numeric factorization? Big hint: do you know how to factor a^3+b^3? Can you show x^n+1 where n is odd has a factor of x+1 without even factorizing the polynomial?
 
Last edited:
I understand your first two questions, so I think to answer the third I need to use prime factorization, which is what I am working on now
 
basik156 said:
I understand your first two questions, so I think to answer the third I need to use prime factorization, which is what I am working on now

No, you don't need prime factorization. You just need know how to find a factor of some polynomial expressions. The question doesn't have anything to do with 11 being prime.
 
I must be missing something big because I can't seem to show that x+1 would be a factor. I do know that any polynomial that has a zero at say x=k has a factor of (x-k).
So if x^(2k+1)+1 and by inspection , when x=-1 we have -1^n +1 where n is odd so -1^n+1 always equals zero. Thus x=-1 is a zero, thus x+1 is a factor.

Have I done the job?
 
basik156 said:
I must be missing something big because I can't seem to show that x+1 would be a factor. I do know that any polynomial that has a zero at say x=k has a factor of (x-k).
So if x^(2k+1)+1 and by inspection , when x=-1 we have -1^n +1 where n is odd so -1^n+1 always equals zero. Thus x=-1 is a zero, thus x+1 is a factor.

Have I done the job?

You've got that part right! Now apply that to 10^3+1, 10^5+1 etc. If x+1 is factor of x^3+1 then 10+1 is a factor of 10^3+1, right?
 
Last edited:
When I claim n is odd haven't I taken care of all of those cases?
 
basik156 said:
When I claim n is odd haven't I taken care of all of those cases?

Sure, now just sum up how the whole thing works. Why did you ask "I must be missing something big because I can't seem to show that x+1 would be a factor."?
 
  • #10
I should've erased that part before I sent that last message. Thanks so much for your guidance!
 

Similar threads

Replies
7
Views
4K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K