Sign Convention for Spring and Pendulum Equations of Motion

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the sign convention for equations of motion in spring and pendulum systems. It establishes that when a mass is suspended from a spring, the static equilibrium position can be analyzed using either upward or downward as positive directions, leading to equations such as mx" + kx = 0 (down positive) and mx" - kx = 0 (up positive). The choice of convention affects the interpretation of the system's motion, particularly when deriving the equations of motion. It is crucial to recognize that both conventions can yield valid equations, but understanding the implications of each is essential for accurate modeling.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Newton's laws of motion
  • Familiarity with Hooke's Law and spring constants
  • Basic knowledge of oscillatory motion and pendulum dynamics
  • Ability to manipulate and solve differential equations
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of the equations of motion for springs using different sign conventions
  • Explore the dynamics of simple pendulums and their equations of motion
  • Learn about the implications of sign conventions in mechanical systems
  • Investigate the stability of oscillatory systems and the role of damping
USEFUL FOR

Students of physics, mechanical engineers, and anyone involved in the analysis of dynamic systems, particularly those focusing on oscillatory motion and mechanical vibrations.

gomerpyle
Messages
40
Reaction score
0
If a mass was hanging vertically from a spring under its own weight.

In the static equilibrium position, using up as positive, the spring force is +kx and gravity is -mg. Add them up to get: kx - mg = 0. Using down as positive, the spring force is -kx and gravity is +mg. Add them: -kx + mg = 0.

In this case it does not matter which convention we use to determine that the initial static deflection is canceled out by the weight, but when we stretch the spring and derive the equation of motion we have either:

mx" + kx = 0 (down taken as positive)
mx" - kx = 0 (up taken as positive)

If we solved the second equation, it would not correctly describe the motion of the system. However, without knowing this how would someone know which sign convention to use? Is there a rule of thumb that would suggest downward as positive would be correct?

The same thing happens with a simple pendulum.

The equation of motion ends up being θ" + g/L*sinθ = 0
However, like with the example above this depends on which direction you take to be positive or negative for the mgsinθ term to be acting in. But, without knowing that you should expect an oscillatory response how would you you know that θ" - g/L*sinθ = 0 is incorrect?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
hi gomerpyle! :smile:
gomerpyle said:
mx" + kx = 0 (down taken as positive)
mx" - kx = 0 (up taken as positive)

no, you're kidding yourself :wink:

the second one uses the same symbol for two different things

we can rewrite them as …

mDown" + kDown = 0 (down taken as positive)
mDown" - kUp = 0 (up taken as positive) …​

both correct! :biggrin:
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
12K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
7K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 76 ·
3
Replies
76
Views
7K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K