Significance of specific votes in sample selection

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the impact of pre-selection in voting outcomes, particularly in contexts like talent competitions. It explores how narrowing a large initial sample, such as 200,000 contestants down to 12, significantly influences the final decision. The consensus suggests that the selection power of the pre-selection team is substantial, overshadowing the subsequent public vote. This raises questions about the quantification of influence between initial selection and final voting outcomes. Ultimately, the pre-selection process appears to hold decisive power over the final results.
Bkkkk
Messages
11
Reaction score
0
I was wondering is there any way to quantify how much "power" a given selection has on the final outcome of a voting. More specifically, say you have a sample 330,000 people and you need to pick one. However, before you get to make a choice a pre-selection is applied and the sample is narrowed to only 20 people, you then choose one person.

How significant is your choice compared to that of the pre-selection in determining who is finally chosen?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Assuming you are talking about an election in which every one gets a single vote, none at all.
 
Specifically I was referring to an x-factor style selection. So there are 200,000 who initially attend auditions. In auditions the number of candidates is reduced to 12 from the original 200,000 by the x-factor producers and judges. The rest of the competition uses a combination of judges and public vote to actually select the final winner. I was wondering if there was any way to quantify how much choosing power or selection power the x-factor team have over the public vote.

My intuition suggests that since the x-factor team reduce the sample of possible participants by a huge amount they have the overwhelming decision power and the public vote as a whole is completely negligible.
 
I was reading documentation about the soundness and completeness of logic formal systems. Consider the following $$\vdash_S \phi$$ where ##S## is the proof-system making part the formal system and ##\phi## is a wff (well formed formula) of the formal language. Note the blank on left of the turnstile symbol ##\vdash_S##, as far as I can tell it actually represents the empty set. So what does it mean ? I guess it actually means ##\phi## is a theorem of the formal system, i.e. there is a...
Back
Top