Similar puzzles with different answers

  • Thread starter Thread starter bob j
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion highlights two probability puzzles that, while seemingly similar, yield different answers due to the information provided. In the pancake problem, seeing a brown side leads to a 2/3 probability that the other side is also brown, as there are three brown sides in total, two of which belong to the all-brown pancake. Conversely, in the child problem, knowing one child is a boy does not provide information about the other child’s gender, resulting in a 1/2 probability that both children are boys. The key difference lies in the available information: the pancake scenario has a defined distribution of sides, while the child scenario lacks clarity on the total gender composition. Understanding these distinctions is crucial for accurate probability assessment.
bob j
Messages
22
Reaction score
0
I have a question about two puzzles that seem similar to me, but I have different answers to them.

One is the following:
You have a hat in which there are three pancakes: One is golden on both sides, one is brown on both sides, and one is golden on one side and brown on the other. You withdraw one pancake, look at one side, and see that it is brown. What is the probability that the other side is brown?

The answer is 2/3 and uses the fact that you had twice as much of probability of choosing the pancake with double brown.

The other problem is this:
Ms. X has two children. You see her walking with one of her children and that child is a boy. What is the probability that both children are boys?
I found this on a book and the answer was 1/2.

Are these different problems? They look the same to me

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
These are different problems. In one case, you know how many golden and brown pancake sides there are. Finding a brown one gives you information about which pancake you picked. In the other case, you have no idea what the genders of the two children are, so the gender of one gives no information about the gender of the other. If you knew there was one boy and one girl, or two boys, you would be able to say the gender of the one not present with certainty, but you don't have this information, so information about one says nothing about the other.
 
could you possibly tell me how to derive that mathematically? It is not clear to me why knowing one side of the pancake is brown is not equivalent to knowing that one child is a boy.

Thanks a lot
 
For the pancake problem, I'm equally likely to pick any side of any pancake. I picked a brown side. There are three brown sides, two of them on the all brown pancake, one on the half brown one. The odds that I picked the all brown pancake then must be 2/3.

For the other case, knowing one kid is a boy, that gives me no information about the other one since I don't know the total numbers.
 
I was reading documentation about the soundness and completeness of logic formal systems. Consider the following $$\vdash_S \phi$$ where ##S## is the proof-system making part the formal system and ##\phi## is a wff (well formed formula) of the formal language. Note the blank on left of the turnstile symbol ##\vdash_S##, as far as I can tell it actually represents the empty set. So what does it mean ? I guess it actually means ##\phi## is a theorem of the formal system, i.e. there is a...

Similar threads

Back
Top