MHB Simple algebra solve (1-x)(1-0.03)^2 = 0.667

  • Thread starter Thread starter bzsmtp
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Algebra
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around solving the equation (1-x)(1-0.03)^2 = 0.667, which is part of a poker book's probability analysis. Initially, the user struggled to reach the answer of x = 0.291. After some confusion, they realized that rearranging the equation allows them to isolate x, leading to the correct calculation. The solution involves understanding that (1-x) can be expressed as 0.667 divided by (1-0.03)^2. Ultimately, the user successfully solved the problem and expressed gratitude for the assistance.
bzsmtp
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
I am following a book and can't arrive at the same answer. Not sure what to try next.

(1-x)(1-0.03)^2

the book then says = 0.667
x= 0.291

my attempt
(1-x)(1 - .03)(1 - .03)

then i get confused
(1-x)(0.9409)

not sure ><
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Hello, and welcome to MHB! (Wave)

Can you post the original problem in its entirety?
 
MarkFL said:
Hello, and welcome to MHB! (Wave)

Can you post the original problem in its entirety?

its a poker book. it says
x is the probability that the original raiser defends, and 1-0.03 is the probability that each blind folds.

then just writes

(1-x)(1-0.03)^2 = 0.667 therefore x = 0.291

- - - Updated - - -

ooooooo i get it

(1-x)(1-0.03)^2 = 0.667 means (1-x)=0.667/(1-0.03)^2=0.667/0.97^2=0.7089 so x=1-0.70289=0.2911

can delete thread now thank you
 
Glad you got it squared away. :)
 
MarkFL said:
Glad you got it squared away. :)
Don't you be no square...:)
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...

Similar threads

Replies
22
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
991
Back
Top