Simple Fluid mechanics question, Need Help

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the confusion between calculating the force exerted by water on a vertical wall using gauge pressure versus absolute pressure. One problem requires the total force, which includes both the force from the water and atmospheric pressure, while the other focuses solely on the force exerted by the water itself, using gauge pressure. Gauge pressure measures the pressure relative to atmospheric pressure, while absolute pressure includes atmospheric pressure. The key distinction lies in whether the problem asks for the total force or just the force due to the water. Understanding this difference clarifies why the two problems are solved differently.
Bassel
Messages
9
Reaction score
0
I've been solving fluid mechanics problems and i encountered two problems that made no sense to me. Both problems that ask about the force done by water on a VERTICAL wall under the level of water. One problem was solved by taking the integral of the gauge pressure and multiplying it by the area while the other was solved by also taking the integral of the gauge pressure and multiplying it by the area of the wall but after finding this value, the force due to atmospheric pressure was added. What happened There?? why two similar cases are solved in different meanings, anyone got any idea?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The only difference that I can see between these two scenarios is that one is using gage pressure and the other is using absolute pressure. Maybe the problem statements have a hint as to why they were solved that way? My only guess as to why this was the case was possibly because one problem statement specifically asked for the force done by the water where as the other one asked for the total force?
 
YESS EXACTLY after looking to the problems again i realized that one asked about the total force and the other asked about the force done by water. but the problem is i don't know the difference and that is why i didn't realize the difference. Can You please give me a summary about the differences please between asking about force done by water and total force ? thanks a lot man sorry for bothering you.
 
Atmospheric pressure is the pressure caused by the atmosphere which is typically considered to be ~101325 Pa. Gage pressure is basically the difference between this number and the pressure that the point of interest is at since "normal conditions" are at atmospheric pressure. The force that is being applied only from the water is the force from the gage pressure; however, this value does not take into account the pressure that the object would typically experience if the water wasn't there and therefore does not take into account this force. If there was no water the wall would still see some force on it because of atmospheric pressure so if you want to find the total force you have to take that force into account as well. The main difference is one only asks for the change in force under normal circumstances where as the other one asks you for the total.
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
Back
Top