Simple Forces: Add/Subtract for Net Force?

  • Thread starter Thread starter p4cifico
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Forces
AI Thread Summary
Understanding when to add or subtract forces like normal, kinetic friction, and tension for net force calculations depends on the chosen sign convention and the direction of the forces involved. Gravity always acts downward, while tension in ropes pulls in the axial direction, and friction opposes motion. For vertical forces, using the convention where up is positive means downward forces are negative, while for horizontal forces, right is positive and left is negative. When using standard angle notation, all forces should be added, and if a force magnitude is negative, adjust the angle by adding 180 degrees. Properly identifying the direction and components of each force is crucial for accurate net force calculations.
p4cifico
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
I am confused as to when I should be able to tell "by observing" whether the forces of normal, kinetic friction, and tension need to be added or subtracted from the net force for both sideways and vertical directions. Ropes pulling at degrees, pulleys moving up and down, cars traveling uphill, how do I know when to subtract or add these forces from \Sigma F (x or y) ?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Almost always, you can tell which way gravity points. And, ropes/strings/wires always pull in the axial direction. Friction always opposes motion (or a tendency toward motion). Normal means perpendicular to a surface.

Then, if you use standard angle notation, you always add all forces; if a force magnitude comes out negative, add 180 degrees to the "guessed" angle. BTW, if by chance you don't know standard angle, ignore this posting.
 
p4cifico said:
...how do I know when to subtract or add these forces from \Sigma F (x or y) ?
I will assume that you know how to determine (by inspection) the actual direction of a force and how to find its components. (TVP45 gave some advice in that regard.) As far as whether you add or subtract a given force when finding the net force, that depends on your sign convention. For example, consider vertical forces. If you take the usual convention where up is positive and down is negative, then any downward force will be negative when adding vertical forces. For horizontal forces, to the right is often positive and to the left is negative.
 
Thread 'Gauss' law seems to imply instantaneous electric field propagation'
Imagine a charged sphere at the origin connected through an open switch to a vertical grounded wire. We wish to find an expression for the horizontal component of the electric field at a distance ##\mathbf{r}## from the sphere as it discharges. By using the Lorenz gauge condition: $$\nabla \cdot \mathbf{A} + \frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial \phi}{\partial t}=0\tag{1}$$ we find the following retarded solutions to the Maxwell equations If we assume that...
Thread 'A scenario of non-uniform circular motion'
(All the needed diagrams are posted below) My friend came up with the following scenario. Imagine a fixed point and a perfectly rigid rod of a certain length extending radially outwards from this fixed point(it is attached to the fixed point). To the free end of the fixed rod, an object is present and it is capable of changing it's speed(by thruster say or any convenient method. And ignore any resistance). It starts with a certain speed but say it's speed continuously increases as it goes...
Maxwell’s equations imply the following wave equation for the electric field $$\nabla^2\mathbf{E}-\frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial^2\mathbf{E}}{\partial t^2} = \frac{1}{\varepsilon_0}\nabla\rho+\mu_0\frac{\partial\mathbf J}{\partial t}.\tag{1}$$ I wonder if eqn.##(1)## can be split into the following transverse part $$\nabla^2\mathbf{E}_T-\frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial^2\mathbf{E}_T}{\partial t^2} = \mu_0\frac{\partial\mathbf{J}_T}{\partial t}\tag{2}$$ and longitudinal part...
Back
Top