Simple Harmonic Motion confusion

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a problem involving simple harmonic motion, specifically analyzing the behavior of a mass-spring system. The original poster presents a scenario where a mass attached to a spring oscillates, and they seek to determine the frequency of the oscillation based on given parameters such as maximum speed and position.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the conservation of energy in the system, questioning how to relate kinetic energy (KE) and potential energy (PE) to find the spring constant (k). There is confusion about the values of k and how they change based on different calculations. Some participants explore the relationship between maximum speed and position, while others express frustration about the complexity of the problem.

Discussion Status

The conversation is ongoing, with participants providing insights into the relationships between energy forms in the system. Some guidance has been offered regarding the use of maximum speed to determine total energy and how to apply that to find k. However, there is no explicit consensus on the correct approach or values, as participants continue to explore different interpretations and calculations.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the challenge of determining the spring constant without complete information and express uncertainty about the interchangeability of kinetic and potential energy in this context. There are also references to the implications of using different energy values in calculations for frequency and amplitude.

knottlena
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
1. A 14.7g mass is attached to a frictionless horizontal spring. After the spring was stretched a certain distance and released, its maximum speed was found to be 4.22 m/s. If the speed at x = -2.84 cm is 1.63 m/s, what is the frequency of the oscillating spring?

2. PEe = kx^2/2 E=KE + PE E=mV^2/2 + kx^2/2 (E is conserved) f = 1/3.14 sq. rt of k/m


3. (.0147kg)(-.0284m)^2/2 = .000005928 J

I don't know how to get (k) and honestly have no idea where to start this problem.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
knottlena said:
3. (.0147kg)(-.0284m)^2/2 = .000005928 J

I don't know how to get (k) and honestly have no idea where to start this problem.


If you know that

E = KE + PE = ½mv2 + ½kx2

When v is maximum what is x ?

That will give you the total energy in the system.

Then you know v for a given x, so just put that into the equation again to get k.
 
rock.freak667 said:
If you know that

E = KE + PE = ½mv2 + ½kx2

When v is maximum what is x ?

That will give you the total energy in the system.

Then you know v for a given x, so just put that into the equation again to get k.

This is where I am just going around in circles. I have Vmax as 4.22 m/s. That is what the question gives, but without (k) I can't find (x) for the Vmax. I can't find PEmax without the (x). The only x value that I have is the -2.84 cm and that is when the spring is now being compressed not stretched. What am I missing here? Why is this so hard?

If I do KE= 1/2(.0147kg)(1.63m/s)^2 = .0195 J or is it N? PE= 1/2 (k)(.-0284m)= PE= (-.0142)(k) Now is PE supposed to be interconvertable with KE?
 
Last edited:
knottlena said:
This is where I am just going around in circles. I have Vmax as 4.22 m/s. That is what the question gives, but without (k) I can't find (x) for the Vmax. I can't find PEmax without the (x). The only x value that I have is the -2.84 cm and that is when the spring is now being compressed not stretched. What am I missing here? Why is this so hard?

If I do KE= 1/2(.0147kg)(1.63m/s)^2 = .0195 J or is it N? PE= 1/2 (k)(.-0284m)= PE= (-.0142)(k) Now is PE supposed to be interconvertable with KE?

with Etotal = KE + PE, as KE increases PE decrease, so when KE is maximum PE is zero. So using Vmax you can get Etotal.

Then you use the second condition of v=1.63 m/s when x= -2.84 cm to get k.
 
rock.freak667 said:
with Etotal = KE + PE, as KE increases PE decrease, so when KE is maximum PE is zero. So using Vmax you can get Etotal.

Then you use the second condition of v=1.63 m/s when x= -2.84 cm to get k.
Thank you for getting back to me so quickly on these, I appreciate it. I am trying so hard. I have gained a few more greys on my head for all this. Anyway...

Is KE interchangable with PE here? If that is so then I would take KE=mV^2/2 = .0147kg(1.63m/s)^2/2 = .0195 and KE is interchangeable with PE then I would do PE = kx^2/2 = .0195J = (k)(-.0284m)^2/2 = .0195(2) = (k)(.000807m) = .039/.000807m = k = 48.3 N/m. Now am I supposed to do (PEmax = KEmax) = (kA^2/2 = mV^2/2) = A= the sq. rt. of mVmax^2/k to get the A for the vmax? If I do then I would get this: A = the sq. rt of (.0147kg)(4.22m/s)^2/48.3 N/m = .0736m.

I thought that PEmax=E? If that is the case I got .1308J. If I use the equation E= 1/2 mV^2 + 1/2 kx^2, plugging in the numbers from above I get E= .2617 J. Now would I have to do PE= E-KE to get .2422 J? I don't see how E works into the equation of f = 1/2(3.14) sq. rt of k/m or which E is the right E...I can't use f = 1/T because I don't have time...wait a minute...could I do T = 2(3.14) sq. rt of m/k and then do 1/T to get the frequency? Do I need E in order to find a new (k)? I thought that (k) always stayed the same?
Say I use E = .1309J then I would get k = 2(.1309)/.0736 = 3.56 (seems like a small k #). If I use E = .2617 I get k = 2(.2617)/.0736 = 7.114. I am confused as to how my (k) can go from 48.3 to either of these #'s. Am I any closer to the right answer yet?
 
knottlena said:
Is KE interchangable with PE here? If that is so then I would take KE=mV^2/2 = .0147kg(1.63m/s)^2/2 = .0195 and KE is interchangeable with PE then I would do PE = kx^2/2 = .0195J = (k)(-.0284m)^2/2 = .0195(2) = (k)(.000807m) = .039/.000807m = k = 48.3 N/m. Now am I supposed to do (PEmax = KEmax) = (kA^2/2 = mV^2/2) = A= the sq. rt. of mVmax^2/k to get the A for the vmax? If I do then I would get this: A = the sq. rt of (.0147kg)(4.22m/s)^2/48.3 N/m = .0736m.

During the entire motion, KE is converted to PE and vice versa for the the other part of the motion.

So when KE is max, PE is zero and when PE is max KE is zero.

From E = KE + PE, when v = 4.22 (max KE) the equation becomes

E = KEmax, so you can sub in the values and get the value for E.

During any moment that is not max KE or PE, the equation is

E = KE + PE = 0.5mv2 + 0.5kx2

you have E from the first part, then they gave you v for some x. (so you can find k)

Now when you get k, you know that ω=√(k/m) where ω = 2π/T.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 51 ·
2
Replies
51
Views
4K
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
30
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
997