Simple harmonic motion - damping introduced

Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
10 replies · 1K views
Jozefina Gramatikova
Messages
62
Reaction score
9

Homework Statement


upload_2018-8-18_17-28-41.png


Homework Equations


upload_2018-8-18_17-29-0.png

upload_2018-8-18_17-29-57.png
[/B]

The Attempt at a Solution


I can solve everything but d). Please help
 

Attachments

  • upload_2018-8-18_17-28-41.png
    upload_2018-8-18_17-28-41.png
    42.7 KB · Views: 663
  • upload_2018-8-18_17-29-0.png
    upload_2018-8-18_17-29-0.png
    5 KB · Views: 672
  • upload_2018-8-18_17-29-57.png
    upload_2018-8-18_17-29-57.png
    2.3 KB · Views: 662
Physics news on Phys.org
The damping coefficient is ## b ## in your formula. Do you know how to solve ## e^{-\frac{b}{2m}t}=\frac{1}{2} ## for ## t ## ? . ## \\ ## Edit: A google of the topic calls ## \gamma=\frac{b}{2m} ## the damping coefficient, but it is really a choice of terminology. By the units they give you, they are giving you ## b ##.
 
Charles Link said:
The damping coefficient is ## b ## in your formula. Do you know how to solve ## e^{-\frac{b}{2m}t}=\frac{1}{2} ## for ## t ## ? .
I don't know how much is x(t)
 
Jozefina Gramatikova said:
I don't know how much is x(t)
The sinusoidal oscillation is assumed to happen at a much higher frequency with small damping, so that the period of the oscillation ## T ## is quite short, and you don't need to consider the term ## \cos(\omega t ) ##. The amplitude is ## A e^{- \frac{b}{2m} t} ##.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Jozefina Gramatikova
Charles Link said:
The sinusoidal oscillation is assumed to happen at a much higher frequency with small damping, so that the period of the oscillation ## T ## is quite short, and you don't need to consider the term ## \cos(\omega t ) ##. The amplitude is ## A e^{- \frac{b}{2m} t} ##.
Ok, thank you and what about x(t)
 
Your (first equation) that you posted in part 2 of the OP for ## x(t) ## is correct. (You didn't list an equation for ## \omega' ## though). And your second equation, which I think is a damping ratio number is really not of prime interest here. It would help if you would state what the parameter is. I had to go googling for the second equation you posted, to see if it was correct.## \\ ## When they say, how long does it take for the amplitude to "halve" that means ## A e^{-\frac{b}{2m} t}=\frac{1}{2} Ae^{-\frac{b}{2m} 0} ##, so that ## e^{-\frac{b}{2m} t}=\frac{1}{2} ##.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Jozefina Gramatikova
Oh, I am sorry I didn't think an equation for w' would be helpful here. Thank you very much for your help!
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Charles Link
Charles Link said:
Now, the next step is take the natural log of both sides of this last equation in order to solve for ## t ##. (It may be worthwhile for me to mention that, because I'm not sure how advanced you may be).
Yeah, I know how to proceed from here ## A e^{-\frac{b}{2m} t}=\frac{1}{2} Ae^{-\frac{b}{2m} 0} ##,. I got t=3.036s. I hope that this is correct
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Charles Link
That's true. I did plug 0.69. Thank you!
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Charles Link