Simple Harmonic Motion for a block-spring system

Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the ratio of kinetic energy (KE) to potential energy (PE) for a block-spring system in simple harmonic motion (SHM) with a phase angle of π/5 radians. The formulas for PE and KE are provided, and the user attempts to solve for the ratio by substituting the phase angle into the equations. Initially, the user believes their calculations are correct but receives feedback indicating an error. The issue is resolved when it is discovered that the calculator was set to degrees instead of radians, confirming the importance of using the correct mode for accurate results. The conversation highlights common pitfalls in physics calculations related to angle measurements.
obxer22
Messages
4
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



If the phase angle for a block-spring system in SHM is π/5 rad and the block's position is given x = xm cos(ωt + phi), what is the ratio of the kinetic energy to the potential energy at time t = 0?

Homework Equations



PE = (1/2)*k*[(max amplitude)^2]*cos^2(ωt + phi)
KE = (1/2)*k*[(max amplitude)^2]*sin^2(ωt + phi)

Solve for KE/PE in that form.

The Attempt at a Solution



I took KE and divided by PE, giving sin^2(phi)/cos^2(phi). Plugging in pi/5 for phi gives us 1.20253316E-4/.99987974669. However, the system is saying this is wrong . I do believe that I solved for KE/PE correctly. Any help would be much appreciated. Thanks very much!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Have you set your calculator to RAD? pi/5 is in radians.

ehild
 
I knew I was doing it right! my calculator was in degrees...i hate it when that happens...thanks for helping me figure that out!
 

Thread 'Magnitude of buoyant force in fluids of different densities'

The book claims the answer is that all the magnitudes are the same because "the gravitational force on the penguin is the same". I'm having trouble understanding this. I thought the buoyant force was equal to the weight of the fluid displaced. Weight depends on mass which depends on density. Therefore, due to the differing densities the buoyant force will be different in each case? Is this incorrect?
View full post »

Similar threads

Position and acceleration in simple harmonic motion given velocity
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
How to prove that motion is periodic but not simple harmonic?
  • · Replies 51 ·
2
Replies
51
Views
4K
Simple Harmonic Motion and Energy Problem
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
Harmonic Motion of a Mass between two springs
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
Pan suspended by a spring (Energy + SHM)
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
4K
Kinetic Energy from a Simple Harmonic motion and spring
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Time period of SHM & Energy conservation in pulley-spring-block system
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
3K
Energy of particle in simple harmonic motion
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
1K
Initial velocity of bird landing on horizontal wire modeled as spring
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
Rotating simple harmonic oscillator
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K