Simple Indicator Function and its Set

  • Thread starter Thread starter Seydlitz
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Function Set
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves a function \( f \) that takes values of either 0 or 1, and it asks to prove the existence of a set \( A \) such that \( f \) can be represented as an indicator function \( C_A \). The context is rooted in set theory and functions, specifically regarding indicator functions and their properties.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking, Exploratory

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants express confusion about the requirements of the problem, particularly regarding the definition of the set \( A \) and the implications of \( f(x) \) being either 0 or 1. There are discussions about whether \( A \) could be defined as the set of all \( x \) where \( f(x) = 1 \) and what that means in terms of the function's behavior.

Discussion Status

Participants are exploring different interpretations of the problem, questioning the nature of the set \( A \) and the conditions under which \( f(x) \) can be defined. Some guidance has been offered regarding the relationship between \( f \) and the set \( A \), but there is no explicit consensus on the definition of \( A \) or the proof structure.

Contextual Notes

There is an ongoing debate about the implications of defining \( A \) based on the values of \( f(x) \) and whether the function can take on different forms, such as being constant or varying based on rationality. The discussion reflects uncertainty about the assumptions and definitions involved in the problem.

Seydlitz
Messages
262
Reaction score
4

Homework Statement



This is taken from Spivak's Calculus Book Chapter 3 - Functions, Problem 9.

Suppose ##f## is a function such that ##f(x)=1\text{ or }0## for each ##x##. Prove that there is a set ##A## such that ##f = C_A## ##C_A## is an indicator function, where ##C_A(x)=0## if ##x## is not in ##A##, and 1 if ##x## is in ##A##

Homework Equations



I've finished the previous sub-problem (a) in the same number.

The Attempt at a Solution


I don't understand clearly what does the problem wants us to prove. Is it asking us whether a set exist like this for example ##A=\{x : f(x)=1 \text{ or } 0\}## exist? How then can we prove that it is true? What kind of condition is that? I mean how can we know what lies inside of a set, with only the property, that it has to lie inside the set. It's a bit confusing..

EDIT: Isn't it like hey I tell my friend to go to a market to buy something and put it in a bucket. So what do you want to buy then? He asked. I want to buy everything that is in that bucket.

Thank You
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Seydlitz said:
I don't understand clearly what does the problem wants us to prove. Is it asking us whether a set exist like this for example ##A=\{x : f(x)=1 \text{ or } 0\}## exist?
Well, it wouldn't be ##A=\{x : f(x)=1 \text{ or } 0\}##. Are there any values of ##x## that are NOT in that set?

You want ##A## to be the set of points ##x## where ##f(x) = ##what value?
 
jbunniii said:
Well, it wouldn't be ##A=\{x : f(x)=1 \text{ or } 0\}##. Are there any values of ##x## that are NOT in that set?

You want ##A## to be the set of points ##x## where ##f(x) = ##what value?

Ah I see, because it is a set of all real number ##x## that ##C_A## is referring to, then there's actually no real number which is not in the set. So ##f(x)## has to be 1. Is the reasoning right?
 
Seydlitz said:
Ah I see, because it is a set of all real number ##x## that ##C_A## is referring to, then there's actually no real number which is not in the set. So ##f(x)## has to be 1. Is the reasoning right?
Right, so write out the definition of ##A## and you're pretty much done. I'm not sure why Spivak is asking for a "proof" here as there isn't much to prove.
 
jbunniii said:
Right, so write out the definition of ##A## and you're pretty much done. I'm not sure why Spivak is asking for a "proof" here as there isn't much to prove.

Ok sure I'll do so. On the other hand, will setting the condition of ##f(x)=0## create an empty set then?

Thanks for your help.
 
No, you are missing the whole point. You are told only that f(x) takes on values of 0 and 1. f(x) could be "f(x)= 0 if x is rational, 1 if x is irrational". In that case, A= {x| f(x)= 1} is the set of irrational numbers, B= {x| f(x)= 0} is the set of rational numbers.

Or you could have f(x) defined to be 0 for all x. In that case A would be empty.
 
HallsofIvy said:
No, you are missing the whole point. You are told only that f(x) takes on values of 0 and 1. f(x) could be "f(x)= 0 if x is rational, 1 if x is irrational". In that case, A= {x| f(x)= 1} is the set of irrational numbers, B= {x| f(x)= 0} is the set of rational numbers.

Or you could have f(x) defined to be 0 for all x. In that case A would be empty.

Yes it is true, but then the question says such that ##f=C_A##. While ##C_A## clearly stipulates 1 for the set of real number ##A##.
 
Seydlitz said:
Yes it is true, but then the question says such that ##f=C_A##. While ##C_A## clearly stipulates 1 for the set of real number ##A##.

Look at the question again:

Seydlitz said:
Suppose ##f## is a function such that ##f(x)=1\text{ or }0## for each ##x##. Prove that there is a set ##A## such that ##f = C_A## ##C_A## is an indicator function, where ##C_A(x)=0## if ##x## is not in ##A##, and 1 if ##x## is in ##A##

This is asking you to prove that, for every f : \mathbb{R} \to \{0, 1\}, there exists a subset A \subset \mathbb{R} such that f(x) = 1 if and only if x \in A and f(x) = 0 if and only if x \in \mathbb{R} \setminus A.

There's really only one choice for A. What is it?
 
pasmith said:
Look at the question again:

This is asking you to prove that, for every f : \mathbb{R} \to \{0, 1\}, there exists a subset A \subset \mathbb{R} such that f(x) = 1 if and only if x \in A and f(x) = 0 if and only if x \in \mathbb{R} \setminus A.

There's really only one choice for A. What is it?

##A## should be the set of real number ##\mathbb{R}## and that ##f(x)=1## because of the fact that there is an element in the set? Is there anything else in it? I'm sorry if I miss the subtleties but the language of set is a bit beyond my level right now.

Edit: Or ##A## must contain all rational number instead?
 
Last edited:
  • #10
A is NOT the set f all real numbers- it is the set of all numbers such that f(x)= 1.
 
  • #11
HallsofIvy said:
A is NOT the set f all real numbers- it is the set of all numbers such that f(x)= 1.

Ok, so this function ##f(x)## so to say is general right? We don't decide for now what makes it 1? We just prepare a container for whatever might make it ##1## according to our own definition?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 35 ·
2
Replies
35
Views
6K