This should be very simple, but I can find a simple example that violates my general conclusion. I clearly must be doing something wrong with my integration by parts. Any suggestions would be great.(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

Define a distribution such that the density;

[tex]\eta(\vec{x})=\int d\vec{k} f(\vec{x},\vec{k})[/tex]

which is a function ONLY ofx.

Now, let me arbitrarily calculate

[tex]\int d\vec{k} k_{x} f(\vec{x},\vec{k}) = \int dk_{x} k_{x} \int dk_{y} \int dk_{z} f(\vec{x},\vec{k})[/tex]

I should be able to integrate over kx by parts;

[tex] k_{x} \int dk_{x} \int dk_{y} \int dk_{z} f(\vec{x},\vec{k}) - \int dk_{x} \frac{d k_{x}}{d k_{x}} \int dk_{x} \int dk_{y} \int dk_{z} f(\vec{x},\vec{k}) = k_{x} \int d\vec{k} f(\vec{x},\vec{k}) - \int dk_{x} \int d\vec{k} f(\vec{x},\vec{k})[/tex]

Using the stipulation at the beginning this is simply;

[tex]k_{x} \eta(\vec{x}) - \int dk_{x} \eta(\vec{x})[/tex]

Since, the density, eta, is only a function ofx, this is zero.

There must be something wrong with this because I can come up with a simple example that contradicts this;

Let

[tex]f(\vec{x},\vec{k})=\eta(\vec{x})\delta (\vec{k}-\vec{k'})[/tex]

It is easy to see that

[tex]\eta(\vec{x})=\int d\vec{k} f(\vec{x},\vec{k})[/tex]

Now calculating the original quantity

[tex]\int d\vec{k} k_{x} f(\vec{x},\vec{k}) = \int dk_{x} k_{x} \eta(\vec{x})\delta (k_{x}-k'_{x}) = \eta(\vec{x}) k'_{x}[/tex]

What gives? Where have I gone wrong?

**Physics Forums | Science Articles, Homework Help, Discussion**

Join Physics Forums Today!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Simple integral, example or general solution correct?

**Physics Forums | Science Articles, Homework Help, Discussion**