Simple pendulum with moving support

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a problem related to a simple pendulum with a moving support, focusing on the conventions of angular rotation and the interpretation of coordinates in a dynamic system. Participants are examining the implications of clockwise versus anticlockwise rotation in the context of the problem presented in Landau's mechanics textbook.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants are exploring the correct interpretation of angular rotation and its effects on the coordinates of the pendulum. There is a focus on the conventions used for defining positive angles and the implications of choosing a direction of rotation.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants providing insights into the assumptions made regarding the direction of rotation. Some have suggested that it is acceptable to choose a direction for the sake of solving the problem, while others are questioning the implications of this choice on the overall understanding of the system.

Contextual Notes

There is a lack of explicit specification in the problem regarding the direction of rotation, leading to varied interpretations among participants. The original problem context is derived from a specific textbook reference, which may influence the conventions being discussed.

member 731016
Homework Statement
I am trying to find the coordinates of a simple pendulum on a rotating support.
Relevant Equations
Please see below.
For this problem,
1712977179205.png

1712977196393.png

The correct coordinates are,
1712977351430.png

However, I am confused how they got them.

So here is my initial diagram. I assume that the point on the vertical circle is rotating counterclockwise, that is, it is rotating from the x-axis to the y-axis.

1712977615661.png


Thus ## \omega t > 0## for the point. i.e angle subtended from positive x-axis to positive y-axis is positive. However, this does not give the correct relations for the point.

To get the correct relations, you must make the diagram,
1712977718709.png

Due to the odd and even function properties of sine and cosine, this gives the desired solution since $$-\omega t < 0$$. However, does anybody please know what convention this is called, i.e. angle $$\omega t$$ rotated from the positive x-axis to the negative y-axis is positive?

Thanks for any help!
 

Attachments

  • 1712977561129.png
    1712977561129.png
    8.9 KB · Views: 92
Physics news on Phys.org
The question does not specify whether the rotation is clockwise or anticlockwise. If it is anticlockwise then the diagrammed position can be thought of as being with t negative.
 
  • Love
Likes   Reactions: member 731016
haruspex said:
The question does not specify whether the rotation is clockwise or anticlockwise. If it is anticlockwise then the diagrammed position can be thought of as being with t negative.
Thank you for your reply @haruspex!

If the question does not specify the direction of rotation, is it in general safe to assume that is it anticlockwise, from the positive x-axis to the positive y-axis?

This question is from landau mechanics 3rd edition page 11, problem 3.

Thanks!
 
ChiralSuperfields said:
Thank you for your reply @haruspex!

If the question does not specify the direction of rotation, is it in general safe to assume that is it anticlockwise, from the positive x-axis to the positive y-axis?
If x is to the right and y is up then yes, but here the positive y axis is down, so all bets are off.
 
  • Like
  • Love
Likes   Reactions: member 731016 and MatinSAR
ChiralSuperfields said:
If the question does not specify the direction of rotation, is it in general safe to assume that is it anticlockwise, from the positive x-axis to the positive y-axis?
The question indeed does not specify the sense of the rotation. However, in order to write equations and solve the problem, one is free to choose but must choose a sense of rotation. The author of the solution has chosen
##x(t)=a\cos\!\gamma t~\implies \dot x(t)=-\gamma a \sin\!\gamma t##
##y(t)=-a\sin\!\gamma t~\implies \dot y(t)=-\gamma a \cos\!\gamma t##
It follows that
##x(0)=a~;~~ \dot x(0)=0##
##y(0)=0~;~~ \dot y(0)=-\gamma a ##
Conventionally assuming that ##\gamma## represents an angular speed not an angular velocity, we see that at ##t=0## the point of support is on the positive x-axis moving in the negative y-direction, i.e. "up" in the original Figure 3. Thus, the author of the solution implicitly chose the rotation to be counterclockwise by specifying ##x(t)## and ##y(t)##.

We can interpret the original Figure 3 as showing the point of support at time ##t## such that ##~\frac{3}{2}\pi < \gamma t < 2\pi##. Your first modified Figure 3 would be correct if you labeled the "larger angle" as ##\gamma t.##
 
Last edited:
  • Like
  • Love
Likes   Reactions: member 731016 and MatinSAR

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
880
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
775
Replies
67
Views
4K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K