Simple pendulum with moving support

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around the correct interpretation of the coordinates for a simple pendulum with a moving support, particularly regarding the direction of rotation. Participants express confusion over whether to assume clockwise or anticlockwise rotation when the problem does not specify. It is clarified that one must choose a sense of rotation for calculations, with the author of the solution implicitly assuming counterclockwise rotation. The equations derived indicate that at time t=0, the support is positioned on the positive x-axis and moving in the negative y-direction. The conversation emphasizes the importance of clearly defining rotation conventions in physics problems.
member 731016
Homework Statement
I am trying to find the coordinates of a simple pendulum on a rotating support.
Relevant Equations
Please see below.
For this problem,
1712977179205.png

1712977196393.png

The correct coordinates are,
1712977351430.png

However, I am confused how they got them.

So here is my initial diagram. I assume that the point on the vertical circle is rotating counterclockwise, that is, it is rotating from the x-axis to the y-axis.

1712977615661.png


Thus ## \omega t > 0## for the point. i.e angle subtended from positive x-axis to positive y-axis is positive. However, this does not give the correct relations for the point.

To get the correct relations, you must make the diagram,
1712977718709.png

Due to the odd and even function properties of sine and cosine, this gives the desired solution since $$-\omega t < 0$$. However, does anybody please know what convention this is called, i.e. angle $$\omega t$$ rotated from the positive x-axis to the negative y-axis is positive?

Thanks for any help!
 

Attachments

  • 1712977561129.png
    1712977561129.png
    8.9 KB · Views: 63
Physics news on Phys.org
The question does not specify whether the rotation is clockwise or anticlockwise. If it is anticlockwise then the diagrammed position can be thought of as being with t negative.
 
  • Love
Likes member 731016
haruspex said:
The question does not specify whether the rotation is clockwise or anticlockwise. If it is anticlockwise then the diagrammed position can be thought of as being with t negative.
Thank you for your reply @haruspex!

If the question does not specify the direction of rotation, is it in general safe to assume that is it anticlockwise, from the positive x-axis to the positive y-axis?

This question is from landau mechanics 3rd edition page 11, problem 3.

Thanks!
 
ChiralSuperfields said:
Thank you for your reply @haruspex!

If the question does not specify the direction of rotation, is it in general safe to assume that is it anticlockwise, from the positive x-axis to the positive y-axis?
If x is to the right and y is up then yes, but here the positive y axis is down, so all bets are off.
 
  • Like
  • Love
Likes member 731016 and MatinSAR
ChiralSuperfields said:
If the question does not specify the direction of rotation, is it in general safe to assume that is it anticlockwise, from the positive x-axis to the positive y-axis?
The question indeed does not specify the sense of the rotation. However, in order to write equations and solve the problem, one is free to choose but must choose a sense of rotation. The author of the solution has chosen
##x(t)=a\cos\!\gamma t~\implies \dot x(t)=-\gamma a \sin\!\gamma t##
##y(t)=-a\sin\!\gamma t~\implies \dot y(t)=-\gamma a \cos\!\gamma t##
It follows that
##x(0)=a~;~~ \dot x(0)=0##
##y(0)=0~;~~ \dot y(0)=-\gamma a ##
Conventionally assuming that ##\gamma## represents an angular speed not an angular velocity, we see that at ##t=0## the point of support is on the positive x-axis moving in the negative y-direction, i.e. "up" in the original Figure 3. Thus, the author of the solution implicitly chose the rotation to be counterclockwise by specifying ##x(t)## and ##y(t)##.

We can interpret the original Figure 3 as showing the point of support at time ##t## such that ##~\frac{3}{2}\pi < \gamma t < 2\pi##. Your first modified Figure 3 would be correct if you labeled the "larger angle" as ##\gamma t.##
 
Last edited:
  • Like
  • Love
Likes member 731016 and MatinSAR
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Back
Top