Simple pendulum with moving support

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the analysis of a simple pendulum with a moving support, specifically addressing the conventions of angular rotation. Participants clarify that when the direction of rotation is unspecified, it is generally assumed to be counterclockwise from the positive x-axis to the positive y-axis. The equations derived for the pendulum's motion are given by x(t) = a \cos(\gamma t) and y(t) = -a \sin(\gamma t), with the angular speed denoted as \gamma. The correct interpretation of the diagram and the choice of rotation direction are critical for solving the problem accurately.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of angular motion and rotation conventions
  • Familiarity with trigonometric functions, specifically sine and cosine
  • Basic knowledge of pendulum dynamics and equations of motion
  • Experience with interpreting diagrams in physics problems
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the properties of sine and cosine functions in relation to angular motion
  • Study the conventions of angular velocity versus angular speed in mechanics
  • Explore the implications of different rotation directions in pendulum problems
  • Examine examples of similar problems in "Landau Mechanics" to reinforce understanding
USEFUL FOR

Students and educators in physics, particularly those studying mechanics and dynamics of pendulums, as well as anyone interested in the conventions of angular motion in physics problems.

member 731016
Homework Statement
I am trying to find the coordinates of a simple pendulum on a rotating support.
Relevant Equations
Please see below.
For this problem,
1712977179205.png

1712977196393.png

The correct coordinates are,
1712977351430.png

However, I am confused how they got them.

So here is my initial diagram. I assume that the point on the vertical circle is rotating counterclockwise, that is, it is rotating from the x-axis to the y-axis.

1712977615661.png


Thus ## \omega t > 0## for the point. i.e angle subtended from positive x-axis to positive y-axis is positive. However, this does not give the correct relations for the point.

To get the correct relations, you must make the diagram,
1712977718709.png

Due to the odd and even function properties of sine and cosine, this gives the desired solution since $$-\omega t < 0$$. However, does anybody please know what convention this is called, i.e. angle $$\omega t$$ rotated from the positive x-axis to the negative y-axis is positive?

Thanks for any help!
 

Attachments

  • 1712977561129.png
    1712977561129.png
    8.9 KB · Views: 87
Physics news on Phys.org
The question does not specify whether the rotation is clockwise or anticlockwise. If it is anticlockwise then the diagrammed position can be thought of as being with t negative.
 
  • Love
Likes   Reactions: member 731016
haruspex said:
The question does not specify whether the rotation is clockwise or anticlockwise. If it is anticlockwise then the diagrammed position can be thought of as being with t negative.
Thank you for your reply @haruspex!

If the question does not specify the direction of rotation, is it in general safe to assume that is it anticlockwise, from the positive x-axis to the positive y-axis?

This question is from landau mechanics 3rd edition page 11, problem 3.

Thanks!
 
ChiralSuperfields said:
Thank you for your reply @haruspex!

If the question does not specify the direction of rotation, is it in general safe to assume that is it anticlockwise, from the positive x-axis to the positive y-axis?
If x is to the right and y is up then yes, but here the positive y axis is down, so all bets are off.
 
  • Like
  • Love
Likes   Reactions: member 731016 and MatinSAR
ChiralSuperfields said:
If the question does not specify the direction of rotation, is it in general safe to assume that is it anticlockwise, from the positive x-axis to the positive y-axis?
The question indeed does not specify the sense of the rotation. However, in order to write equations and solve the problem, one is free to choose but must choose a sense of rotation. The author of the solution has chosen
##x(t)=a\cos\!\gamma t~\implies \dot x(t)=-\gamma a \sin\!\gamma t##
##y(t)=-a\sin\!\gamma t~\implies \dot y(t)=-\gamma a \cos\!\gamma t##
It follows that
##x(0)=a~;~~ \dot x(0)=0##
##y(0)=0~;~~ \dot y(0)=-\gamma a ##
Conventionally assuming that ##\gamma## represents an angular speed not an angular velocity, we see that at ##t=0## the point of support is on the positive x-axis moving in the negative y-direction, i.e. "up" in the original Figure 3. Thus, the author of the solution implicitly chose the rotation to be counterclockwise by specifying ##x(t)## and ##y(t)##.

We can interpret the original Figure 3 as showing the point of support at time ##t## such that ##~\frac{3}{2}\pi < \gamma t < 2\pi##. Your first modified Figure 3 would be correct if you labeled the "larger angle" as ##\gamma t.##
 
Last edited:
  • Like
  • Love
Likes   Reactions: member 731016 and MatinSAR

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
855
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
757
Replies
67
Views
4K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
994
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K