MHB Simple Unitial Rings .... centre is a field .... ? ....

  • Thread starter Thread starter Math Amateur
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Field Rings
Math Amateur
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
3,920
Reaction score
48
I am reading Matej Bresar's book, "Introduction to Noncommutative Algebra" and am currently focussed on Chapter 1: Finite Dimensional Division Algebras ... ...

I need help with some remarks of Bresar in Example 1.21 on simple unital rings ...

Example 1.21 reads as follows:
View attachment 6250In the above text from Bresar, we read the following:

" ... ... Indeed, if $$c$$ is a nonzero central element, then $$cA$$ must be, as a nonzero idea of $$A$$, equal to $$A$$. This implies that $$c$$ is invertible. ... ... "Can someone please show me exactly why it is the case that $$cA$$ being equal to $$A$$ implies that $$c$$ is invertible ... Help will be appreciated ...

Peter
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Since $1 \in A$, then $1\in cA$. Thus, there is a $d\in A$ such that $1 = cd$. Since $c$ is central, $cd = dc$. So $cd = 1 = dc$, showing that $c$ is invertible.
 
Euge said:
Since $1 \in A$, then $1\in cA$. Thus, there is a $d\in A$ such that $1 = cd$. Since $c$ is central, $cd = dc$. So $cd = 1 = dc$, showing that $c$ is invertible.

Thanks Euge ... appreciate your help ...

Peter
 
##\textbf{Exercise 10}:## I came across the following solution online: Questions: 1. When the author states in "that ring (not sure if he is referring to ##R## or ##R/\mathfrak{p}##, but I am guessing the later) ##x_n x_{n+1}=0## for all odd $n$ and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible, so that ##x_n=0##" 2. How does ##x_nx_{n+1}=0## implies that ##x_{n+1}## is invertible and ##x_n=0##. I mean if the quotient ring ##R/\mathfrak{p}## is an integral domain, and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible then...
The following are taken from the two sources, 1) from this online page and the book An Introduction to Module Theory by: Ibrahim Assem, Flavio U. Coelho. In the Abelian Categories chapter in the module theory text on page 157, right after presenting IV.2.21 Definition, the authors states "Image and coimage may or may not exist, but if they do, then they are unique up to isomorphism (because so are kernels and cokernels). Also in the reference url page above, the authors present two...
When decomposing a representation ##\rho## of a finite group ##G## into irreducible representations, we can find the number of times the representation contains a particular irrep ##\rho_0## through the character inner product $$ \langle \chi, \chi_0\rangle = \frac{1}{|G|} \sum_{g\in G} \chi(g) \chi_0(g)^*$$ where ##\chi## and ##\chi_0## are the characters of ##\rho## and ##\rho_0##, respectively. Since all group elements in the same conjugacy class have the same characters, this may be...
Back
Top