I am studying general relativity from Sean Carroll's text and I have a simple question about the wedge product. According to the text, the wedge product of two one-forms (dual vectors) is(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

[tex](A \wedge B)_{\mu\nu} = 2A_{[\mu}B_{\nu]} = A_\mu B_\nu - A_\nu B_\mu[/tex]

I understand the why the first two expressions are equal given the definition of the wedge product. I also understand that the square brackets in the third second expression denotes antisymmetry and that the two indices can be exchanged at the cost of a minus sign. However, the third expression seems to imply that the antisymmetry of the two indices (perhaps because they belong to two different quantities) really means the expansion given in the third expression. Can anyone clear up what I'm sure is a simple misunderstanding of notation?

Followup question: what is the meaning of, for example in Minkowski spacetime with spherical spatial coordinates, [tex]d\theta \wedge d\phi[/tex]? I know that each of these is a (basis) one-form but I'm not sure how exactly to apply the wedge product to them.

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Simple wedge product issue

Loading...

Similar Threads - Simple wedge product | Date |
---|---|

I Simple Velocity Relativity Problem | Dec 20, 2017 |

I Relativistic mass increase (simple or not) | Aug 8, 2017 |

A Simple 1D kinematic exercises with metric tensor | May 24, 2017 |

I Wedge Product | May 14, 2017 |

B Very simple question about GR | Oct 17, 2016 |

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**