Engineering Simplifying a series / parallel circuit and calculating unknown values

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on simplifying a circuit with both series and parallel components to calculate unknown values such as currents, total resistance, and total voltage. The user initially struggled with a confusing connector in the circuit but later redrew it, leading to calculations of 2A total current, 7Ω total resistance, and 14V total voltage. Clarification was provided that the two bottom resistors are in parallel, and the user was encouraged to visualize the circuit with equivalent resistors for easier analysis. The importance of understanding that the voltage remains the same at the junction was emphasized, along with the application of Kirchhoff's Current Law. Overall, the conversation highlights the need for a clear interpretation of circuit connections to accurately determine current flow.
jimmystevens123
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Homework Statement
I'm struggling with interpreting the circuit correctly, and checking my work afterwards yields confusing results.
Relevant Equations
Kirchhoff's Current Law
Ohms Law
Circuit1.jpg


Given the circuit above, I have to solve for the labelled currents, find V total and R total accordingly. 1A is flowing through the 5Ω resistor as shown. Assuming electron flow (negative terminal to positive) for circuit.

The connector in the middle was somewhat confusing. Without it, this would be much simpler. At any rate, I redrew the circuit (perhaps incorrectly) as follows:

Circuit1_Redrawn.jpg
If I have a 1A going through one identical parallel resistor, I must have 1A going through the other.

Adding the equivalent parallel resistor values, I get 4.5 + 2.5 = 7Ω.

2A across 2.5Ω = 5V dropped.
2A across 4.5Ω = 9V dropped.

R total = 7Ω
I total= 2A
V total = 14V

Using Kirchoffs Current Law - (i2 = It * R1 / R1+R2) 2A * 6/6+18 = 0.5A?
i1 = 2A * 18/6+18 = 1.5A?

I feel like the redraw was a mistake, because without that junction, the values don't make any sense in the original circuit.
Circuit1_redrawn2.jpg
My question is, how do I interpret this circuit correctly? How do I know if any current is going to flow through the middle connector, and if so, how much? It's not intuitive to me at all. Apologies for the length.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The thing to think about the tie connection in the middle - the voltage is the same at that point.

If it is an ideal conductor (0 ohms) then regardless of the amount of current through it, there is zero voltage drop. This makes the two bottom resistors in parallel, and the two top ones in parallel.

The way you redrew it is electrically the same as the original drawing.

Your calculations look correct - I would add some parentheses to make it a little more clear.

So if 1.5 A flows through R1, and 0.5 A flows through R2, and you have the currents in the bottom two resistors, how much flows through the tie connector?
 
Last edited:
My 2¢ is simply that you are over thinking it. Remember that no matter what, the top two resistors are in parallel. Of course it's the same case for the bottom two. If you are given a current through one resistor you know the voltage across it. It may help you to redraw with the top and bottom each having one equivalent resistor. You may find you go back and forth between the two schematics to help in solving.
 
Thanks very much for your replies gentleman, I can see now where I was confused.
 
Thread 'Have I solved this structural engineering equation correctly?'
Hi all, I have a structural engineering book from 1979. I am trying to follow it as best as I can. I have come to a formula that calculates the rotations in radians at the rigid joint that requires an iterative procedure. This equation comes in the form of: $$ x_i = \frac {Q_ih_i + Q_{i+1}h_{i+1}}{4K} + \frac {C}{K}x_{i-1} + \frac {C}{K}x_{i+1} $$ Where: ## Q ## is the horizontal storey shear ## h ## is the storey height ## K = (6G_i + C_i + C_{i+1}) ## ## G = \frac {I_g}{h} ## ## C...

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
17
Views
12K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
5K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
3K
Back
Top