MHB Simplifying a square root in a fraction, part of midpoint formula

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on simplifying square roots in fractions and clarifies common misconceptions, particularly the "Freshman's Dream," which incorrectly suggests that the sum of square roots can be simplified as a single square root. The correct approach involves recognizing that while multiplication and division of square roots can be combined, addition cannot. For example, the expression (sqrt(2) + sqrt(2)) / 2 simplifies to sqrt(2), illustrating that the average of two identical values is the same as the values themselves. The conversation emphasizes the importance of understanding the rules of exponents and the distinction between addition and multiplication in mathematical operations. Ultimately, the midpoint of two identical values must reflect their common value, reinforcing the need for clarity in simplifying square roots.
OMGMathPLS
Messages
64
Reaction score
0
I have:

sq rt 2 +sq rt 2 over 2 , sq rt 5 + sq rt 5 over 2

I got (sq rt 4 over 2, and 0) = 1, 0

but the answer is actually (sq rt 2, 0)

so is my answer still wrong?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
First, you cannot state:

$$\sqrt{a}+\sqrt{b}=\sqrt{a+b}$$

This is not true in general.

But, this kind of mistake is so common, it is referred to as the "Freshman's Dream."

What you want to do is:

$$\frac{\sqrt{2}+\sqrt{2}}{2}=\frac{2\sqrt{2}}{2}=\sqrt{2}$$

Think about it...you are finding the arithmetic mean, or average, of two numbers that happen to have the same value...wouldn't you then expect the average to be the same as the two identical values?
 
no, it doesn't really make sense because you guys said that it can be broken apart... so it can't be combined?

You said that sq rt 12 can become sq rt 3 + sq rt 4

something similar to that. That's probably wrong, but I'm referring to an earlier question i asked. So it just seems natural you can combine them. sorry I can't see through beyond dream but thanks for explaining it.
 
OMGMathPLS said:
no, it doesn't really make sense because you guys said that it can be broken apart... so it can't be combined?

You said that sq rt 12 can become sq rt 3 + sq rt 4

something similar to that. That's probably wrong, but I'm referring to an earlier question i asked. So it just seems natural you can combine them. sorry I can't see through beyond dream but thanks for explaining it.

What you can do is:

$$\sqrt{12}=\sqrt{4\cdot3}=\sqrt{4}\cdot\sqrt{3}=2\sqrt{3}$$

But, you cannot do this with addition. This has to do with rules of exponents (since a square root is a rational exponent).

It is true that:

$$(ab)^c=a^cb^c$$

But it is not true that:

$$(a+b)^c=a^c+b^c$$

This is the "Freshman's Dream" in its most common form. :D
 
Ok that makes sense. I can only be done with mult and division but not sub and add.

Because a term is only addition but a factor is like multiplication. And more can be done with that.
 
I wanted to reiterate my point earlier about the mean of two identical values being the same as the two values. Suppose there are two people and both weigh 150 lb. Wouldn't you then expect the average weight of the two people to be 150 lb.?

Suppose our two data values are $x$. Then the mean is:

$$\overline{x}=\frac{x+x}{2}=\frac{2x}{2}=x$$

So, this corresponds to the fact that if we are given two points in the $xy$-plane and both points are on the same horizontal or vertical line, then the mid-point will also be on this line. Does this make sense intuitively?
 
You make sense. I am just new at this.

I don't know why the sq rt had to stay.
 
OMGMathPLS said:
You make sense. I am just new at this.

I don't know why the sq rt had to stay.

Both points lie along the line $x=\sqrt{2}$, and so the $x$-coordinate of the mid-point must lie along this line also, and so the $x$-coordinate of the mid-point has to be $\sqrt{2}$. :D
 
MarkFL said:
Both points lie along the line $x=\sqrt{2}$, and so the $x$-coordinate of the mid-point must lie along this line also, and so the $x$-coordinate of the mid-point has to be $\sqrt{2}$. :D

because it's already in that form
keep it that way
 
Back
Top