Simplifying Clause: A' & B' or A & B

  • Thread starter Thread starter EvLer
  • Start date Start date
EvLer
Messages
454
Reaction score
0
Hi everyone,
how can I simplify this clause to remove parenthesis:

(A' or B) and (B' or A) ?

thanks in advance.

ps: iff is not allowed :frown:
 
Physics news on Phys.org
EvLer said:
Hi everyone,
how can I simplify this clause to remove parenthesis:

(A' or B) and (B' or A) ?

thanks in advance.

ps: iff is not allowed :frown:
What are A and B? Is this logic, set theory, probability, ??
 
A and B are "literals" as the book refers to them or n-ary predicates.
Sorry, should have specified: it's First Order Predicate Calculus. This isn't really an excersize. It's just that I saw that logical equivalence
A <=> B
can be rewritten as: (A -> B) and (B -> A);
further, implications (A -> B) are rewritten as: A' or B;
so if i rewrite the logical equivalence i get: (A' or B) and (B' or A)
but i was wondering if it was possible to further simplify this clause :confused:
[edit] i know how to apply distributive laws in cases like this:
(A and B) or C
or similar, but not sure how that might work in clause with 4 predicates [/edit]
 
Last edited:
What do you mean by "simplify"? It seems to me that A <-> B is the simplest form. You could write it as (A and B) or (A' and B')
 
AKG said:
It seems to me that A <-> B is the simplest form. You could write it as (A and B) or (A' and B')
well, just was curios, that's all...

Thanks!
 
Namaste & G'day Postulate: A strongly-knit team wins on average over a less knit one Fundamentals: - Two teams face off with 4 players each - A polo team consists of players that each have assigned to them a measure of their ability (called a "Handicap" - 10 is highest, -2 lowest) I attempted to measure close-knitness of a team in terms of standard deviation (SD) of handicaps of the players. Failure: It turns out that, more often than, a team with a higher SD wins. In my language, that...
Hi all, I've been a roulette player for more than 10 years (although I took time off here and there) and it's only now that I'm trying to understand the physics of the game. Basically my strategy in roulette is to divide the wheel roughly into two halves (let's call them A and B). My theory is that in roulette there will invariably be variance. In other words, if A comes up 5 times in a row, B will be due to come up soon. However I have been proven wrong many times, and I have seen some...
Back
Top