Simplifying equations (thought process)

jongro
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Take this equation:
f(x) = u0.5(2 - 2u) + (2u - u2)(0.5u-0.5)

My lecturer simplified it to this:
f(x) = (2u(2 - 2u) + (2u - u2)) / (2u0.5)
= (6u - 5u2) / (2u0.5)

My intuition tells me to simplify it like this:
f(x) = 2u0.5 - 2u1.5 + u0.5 - 0.5u1.5
= sqrt(u)(3 - (5/2)u)

My problem is that, while I can see how they're both valid, I cannot understand how in the world how the lecturer could think like that?

This question probably sounds ridiculous, but could someone please explain to me the thought process involved in simplifying the equation like the lecturer did? It just seems REALLY unnatural for me.

What are some of the things that mathematicians look for when they have an equation that they want to factorize and simplify?

I think that there is something really messed up with the way I think about equations.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Distributive property for the first expression and transformation of the second expression into a form with only positive exponent. Next process was simple fraction arithmetic.
 
jongro said:
What are some of the things that mathematicians look for when they have an equation that they want to factorize and simplify?
I think that there is something really messed up with the way I think about equations.
To be honest I don't believe your lecturer is very confident at manipulating equations. He probably did the first thing that came into his mind instead of thinking twice and doing the better way. I think your way is best.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top