Simplifying Expressions Involving Square and Fourth Roots

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on simplifying the expression -SQRT(18-12SQRT(2))/6 into a form involving only square roots. Participants demonstrate that the expression can be factored to -SQRT(6(3-2SQRT(2))), leading to further simplification. Through guess and check, they identify that the expression can be rewritten as -SQRT(6)(1-SQRT(2)), ultimately resulting in SQRT(6) - 2SQRT(3). The conversation emphasizes the importance of careful factoring and recognizing negative roots in simplification processes. Overall, the thread provides a step-by-step approach to simplifying complex radical expressions.
oconnk
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
I was looking over a problem to make sure I hadn't messed up my arithmetic and I put the term (-SQRT(18-12SQRT(2))/6 into my calculator and it reduced it to (2SQRT(3)-SQRT(6))/6.
I found approximate values for these two expressions and they were in fact equal. So my question is, how does one figure out how to reduce expressions involving fourth roots and square roots into those involving only square roots without the use of a TI-89 or any other exact value calculator? Could you show me step-by-step on this one as an example?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Obviously the simplification happens in the numerator so I'll ignore the 1/6. To simplify this we need to take care of the difference underneath the radical. We do this by factoring. First remove any unnecessary factors.
<br /> -\sqrt{18-12\sqrt{2}} = -\sqrt{6(3-2\sqrt{2})}<br />
You can probably see that, if this can be factored, then the factored form looks like (a+b\sqrt{2})^2. There aren't many possibilities for 3-2\sqrt{2} and by some guess and check you'll find that a=1 and b=-1.
<br /> -\sqrt{6(1-\sqrt{2})^2} = -\sqrt{6}(1-\sqrt{2}) = \sqrt{6} - 2\sqrt{3} <br />
 
Last edited by a moderator:
oconnk, you sure you're not forgetting a minus sign somewhere? They're negatives of one another.

Since 1-sqrt(2)<0, the square root of it squared (forgive the stupid wording, I'm exhausted) is sqrt(2)-1, and the rest of the above post still works.
 
Tobias Funke said:
oconnk, you sure you're not forgetting a minus sign somewhere? They're negatives of one another.

Since 1-sqrt(2)<0, the square root of it squared (forgive the stupid wording, I'm exhausted) is sqrt(2)-1, and the rest of the above post still works.


Yes and I made the same error!
 
Obviously the simplification happens in the numerator so I'll ignore the 1/6. To simplify this we need to take care of the difference underneath the radical. We do this by factoring. First remove any unnecessary factors.
<br /> -\sqrt{18-12\sqrt{2}} = -\sqrt{6(3-2\sqrt{2})}<br />
You can probably see that, if this can be factored, then the factored form looks like
(a+b2√)2
. There aren't many possibilities for
3−22√
and by some guess and check you'll find that a=1 and b=-1.
<br /> -\sqrt{6(1-\sqrt{2})^2} = -\sqrt{6}(1-\sqrt{2}) = \sqrt{6} - 2\sqrt{3} <br />

for more on http://math.tutorvista.com/algebra/simplifying-expressions.html" log on to tutorvista.com
 
Last edited by a moderator:
qntty and Anant9, don't use the tag "latex" on this form. Use "tex" or, for inline, "itex" only. I edited your posts, replacing "latex" with "tex".
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Back
Top