Simplifying the integral of dirac delta functions

Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on understanding how to integrate Dirac delta functions, particularly in the context of a specific integral involving a delta function. It clarifies that the integral of a delta function, such as δ(x+1), simplifies to evaluating the function at the point where the argument of the delta function is zero, leading to f(-1) in this case. Participants emphasize that the limits of integration must include the point where the delta function is non-zero, which is crucial for obtaining the correct result. The conversation highlights that if the limits do not encompass this point, the integral will yield zero. Overall, mastering the properties of the Dirac delta function is essential for solving related integrals correctly.
sleventh
Messages
61
Reaction score
0
hello all,
i am unaware of how to handle a delta function. from what i read online the integral will be 1 from one point to another since at zero the "function" is infinite. overall though i don't think i know the material well enough to trust my answer. and help on how to take the integral of a dirac delta function would be much appreciated. the kind of problems I am dealing with are similar to
\inte^(-x^2) \delta(x+1)[1-cos(5 (pi/2) x)] dx from -infinity to 0
for this i solved the delta function for when x+1=0 since that is the only time when the function will have a value. i then subbed -1 for all x's and took the integral, assuming the delta function became 1.
thank you very much for help
 
Physics news on Phys.org
hello sleventh! :smile:

(have a delta: δ :wink:)
sleventh said:
i then subbed -1 for all x's and took the integral, assuming the delta function became 1.

no, there's no integral in the result …

δ is defined by the property ∫ δ(x) f(x) dx = f(0) for any f.

Put F(x) = f(x-1).

Then ∫ δ(x+1) f(x) dx = ∫ δ(x) f(x-1) dx = ∫ δ(x) F(x) dx = F(0) = f(-1). :wink:

Do you see how the δ function gets rid of the integral? :smile:
 
hey tiny-tim. thank you very much. that clears up a lot. so if you were to be taking the integral of the above problem from limits 0-∞ (thanks for the copy and paste) would the problem have the same solution as -∞ -0 because you are still subbing in 0 to the f(x-1) adaptation of the function?
 
Hi sleventh! :smile:

Any limits have to strictly include the zero of what's inside the δ (which in this case is -1) …

so it can be ∫-∞ or ∫-∞0 or ∫-20,

but not ∫0 or even ∫-1 or ∫-∞-1 :wink:
 
Question: A clock's minute hand has length 4 and its hour hand has length 3. What is the distance between the tips at the moment when it is increasing most rapidly?(Putnam Exam Question) Answer: Making assumption that both the hands moves at constant angular velocities, the answer is ## \sqrt{7} .## But don't you think this assumption is somewhat doubtful and wrong?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
4K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
4K