Simplifying the integral of dirac delta functions

Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
3 replies · 7K views
sleventh
Messages
61
Reaction score
0
hello all,
i am unaware of how to handle a delta function. from what i read online the integral will be 1 from one point to another since at zero the "function" is infinite. overall though i don't think i know the material well enough to trust my answer. and help on how to take the integral of a dirac delta function would be much appreciated. the kind of problems I am dealing with are similar to
[tex]\int[/tex]e^(-x^2) [tex]\delta[/tex](x+1)[1-cos(5 (pi/2) x)] dx from -infinity to 0
for this i solved the delta function for when x+1=0 since that is the only time when the function will have a value. i then subbed -1 for all x's and took the integral, assuming the delta function became 1.
thank you very much for help
 
Physics news on Phys.org
hello sleventh! :smile:

(have a delta: δ :wink:)
sleventh said:
i then subbed -1 for all x's and took the integral, assuming the delta function became 1.

no, there's no integral in the result …

δ is defined by the property ∫ δ(x) f(x) dx = f(0) for any f.

Put F(x) = f(x-1).

Then ∫ δ(x+1) f(x) dx = ∫ δ(x) f(x-1) dx = ∫ δ(x) F(x) dx = F(0) = f(-1). :wink:

Do you see how the δ function gets rid of the integral? :smile:
 
hey tiny-tim. thank you very much. that clears up a lot. so if you were to be taking the integral of the above problem from limits 0-∞ (thanks for the copy and paste) would the problem have the same solution as -∞ -0 because you are still subbing in 0 to the f(x-1) adaptation of the function?
 
Hi sleventh! :smile:

Any limits have to strictly include the zero of what's inside the δ (which in this case is -1) …

so it can be ∫-∞ or ∫-∞0 or ∫-20,

but not ∫0 or even ∫-1 or ∫-∞-1 :wink: