Simplifying this derivative....

Click For Summary
The discussion revolves around evaluating the derivative of the function f(w) = cos(sin^(-1)(2w)) using the chain rule. The initial attempt yielded F'(w) = -[2sin(sin^(-1)(2w))]/[sqrt(1-4w^2)], but the book's answer is F'(w) = (-4w)/sqrt(1-4w^2). The key point of confusion is the disappearance of sin and sin^(-1), which occurs because they are inverse functions, leading to sin(sin^(-1)(x)) = x. This clarification resolves the misunderstanding regarding simplification in the derivative calculation. Understanding inverse functions is crucial in this context.
Jess Karakov
Messages
11
Reaction score
3

Homework Statement


Evaluate the derivative of the following function:
f(w)= cos(sin^(-1)2w)

Homework Equations


Chain Rule
eq0008M.gif


The Attempt at a Solution


I did just as the chain rule says where
F'(w)= -[2sin(sin^(-1)2w)]/[sqrt(1-4w^(2))

but the book gave the answer as F'(w)=(-4w)/sqrt(1-4w^(2))

and I'm wondering if there is some kind of simplification I'm missing. Why would sin and sin^(-1) disappear?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Jess Karakov said:

Homework Statement


Evaluate the derivative of the following function:
f(w)= cos(sin^(-1)2w)

Homework Equations


Chain Rule
View attachment 206165

The Attempt at a Solution


I did just as the chain rule says where
F'(w)= -[2sin(sin^(-1)2w)]/[sqrt(1-4w^(2))

but the book gave the answer as F'(w)=(-4w)/sqrt(1-4w^(2))

and I'm wondering if there is some kind of simplification I'm missing. Why would sin and sin^(-1) disappear?

Because they are inverse functions. ##\sin(\sin^{-1}(x))=x##.
 
  • Like
Likes Jess Karakov
Dick said:
Because they are inverse functions. ##\sin(\sin^{-1}(x))=x##.
Ah okay. I wasn't aware of this. Thank you.
 
Question: A clock's minute hand has length 4 and its hour hand has length 3. What is the distance between the tips at the moment when it is increasing most rapidly?(Putnam Exam Question) Answer: Making assumption that both the hands moves at constant angular velocities, the answer is ## \sqrt{7} .## But don't you think this assumption is somewhat doubtful and wrong?

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K